Does Envelopment Through Data Advantage Call for New Regulation?

Gregor Langus, V. Lipatov
{"title":"Does Envelopment Through Data Advantage Call for New Regulation?","authors":"Gregor Langus, V. Lipatov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3805458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Envelopment is an effective form of market entry that facilitates competition among platforms. Nevertheless, many commentators have focused on the anticompetitive potential of envelopment, and some have argued for regulation of platforms because of that concern. These calls for regulation are not supported by robust formal analysis or comprehensive empirical evidence. We analyze a visible recent contribution by Condorelli and Padilla (2020a,b) and explain why the model that they put forward is not ripe for policy advice in relation to concerns with envelopment.","PeriodicalId":217784,"journal":{"name":"CESifo: Economics of Digitization (Topic)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESifo: Economics of Digitization (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Envelopment is an effective form of market entry that facilitates competition among platforms. Nevertheless, many commentators have focused on the anticompetitive potential of envelopment, and some have argued for regulation of platforms because of that concern. These calls for regulation are not supported by robust formal analysis or comprehensive empirical evidence. We analyze a visible recent contribution by Condorelli and Padilla (2020a,b) and explain why the model that they put forward is not ripe for policy advice in relation to concerns with envelopment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据优势带来的包络效应需要新的监管吗?
包络是一种有效的市场进入形式,促进了平台之间的竞争。然而,许多评论人士关注的是包络的反竞争潜力,出于这种担忧,一些人主张对平台进行监管。这些要求监管的呼声没有得到有力的形式分析或全面的经验证据的支持。我们分析了Condorelli和Padilla (2020a,b)最近的一项显著贡献,并解释了为什么他们提出的模型在涉及包络的政策建议方面还不成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Roaming Regulation on Revenues and Prices of Mobile Operators in the EU Selling Cross-Border in Online Markets: The Impact of the Ban on Geoblocking Strategies Does Telecommuting Reduce Commuting Emissions? The Impact of the German 'DEAL' on Competition in the Academic Publishing Market A Bias-Corrected CD Test for Error Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Models with Latent Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1