Evaluation of a White Seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) Enhancement Program in California

Theresa Sinicrope Talley, Nina Venuti, R. Starr, Christopher Myrick
{"title":"Evaluation of a White Seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) Enhancement Program in California","authors":"Theresa Sinicrope Talley, Nina Venuti, R. Starr, Christopher Myrick","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.77310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific knowledge and technologies needed to attempt marine stock enhancement have grown in recent decades, yet contributions of many enhancement programs to wild stocks generally remain low. Additionally, enhancement programs are often less effec - tive than they could be in contributing to associated social, economic and management objectives due to exclusion of non-science factors in program planning. An independent evaluation of a White Seabass ( Atractoscion nobilis ) enhancement program in California highlighted advances and shortfalls in a 30-year old, publicly funded program. While the program advanced the knowledge of biology and culture of White Seabass, it contributed <1% of fish caught in the state’s fisheries. Further, the social and economic impacts of the program remained unassessed despite the potential significance of these impacts. The review highlighted the importance of regular, independent reviews to help stock enhancement programs achieve progress in meeting goals, and for adaptive manage ment. In general, the California White Seabass enhancement program’s success in meet - ing goals was dependent upon the existence of clear, agreed-upon goals and objectives; appropriate levels of funding; internal organizational cooperation; evidence of public benefit and support; improved assessment strategies; and unified, transparent messag ing. Lessons learned from this review are applicable to other stock enhancement efforts.","PeriodicalId":412728,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Management - Failures, Successes and Prospects","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Management - Failures, Successes and Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.77310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific knowledge and technologies needed to attempt marine stock enhancement have grown in recent decades, yet contributions of many enhancement programs to wild stocks generally remain low. Additionally, enhancement programs are often less effec - tive than they could be in contributing to associated social, economic and management objectives due to exclusion of non-science factors in program planning. An independent evaluation of a White Seabass ( Atractoscion nobilis ) enhancement program in California highlighted advances and shortfalls in a 30-year old, publicly funded program. While the program advanced the knowledge of biology and culture of White Seabass, it contributed <1% of fish caught in the state’s fisheries. Further, the social and economic impacts of the program remained unassessed despite the potential significance of these impacts. The review highlighted the importance of regular, independent reviews to help stock enhancement programs achieve progress in meeting goals, and for adaptive manage ment. In general, the California White Seabass enhancement program’s success in meet - ing goals was dependent upon the existence of clear, agreed-upon goals and objectives; appropriate levels of funding; internal organizational cooperation; evidence of public benefit and support; improved assessment strategies; and unified, transparent messag ing. Lessons learned from this review are applicable to other stock enhancement efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加利福尼亚白鲈鱼(Atractoscion nobilis)强化计划的评价
近几十年来,尝试增加海洋种群所需的科学知识和技术不断发展,但许多增加野生种群的计划的贡献通常仍然很低。此外,由于在项目规划中排除了非科学因素,提高项目在促进相关的社会、经济和管理目标方面的效果往往不如预期。一项对加州白鲈鱼(Atractoscion nobilis)强化项目的独立评估强调了这个30年历史的公共资助项目的进步和不足。虽然该计划提高了人们对白鲈鱼的生物学和养殖知识,但它对该州渔业捕捞的鱼的贡献还不到1%。此外,该计划的社会和经济影响仍未得到评估,尽管这些影响可能具有重大意义。该审查强调了定期独立审查的重要性,以帮助库存增加计划在实现目标方面取得进展,并有利于适应性管理。总的来说,加州白鲈鱼增强计划能否成功实现目标取决于是否存在明确的、商定的目标和目的;适当的资金数额;内部组织合作;公共利益和支持的证据;改进评估策略;以及统一、透明的信息传递。从这次审查中吸取的经验教训适用于其他增加库存的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marine Stock Enhancement, Restocking, and Sea Ranching in Korea Community-Based Conservation: An Emerging Land Use at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface in Northern Kenya Spatial and Temporal Vegetation Dynamics: Opportunities and Constraints behind Wildlife Migration in Eastern Africa Savanna Ecosystem Emerging Bacterial Zoonoses in Migratory Birds Successes, Threats, and Factors Influencing the Performance of a Community-Based Wildlife Management Approach: The Case of Wami Mbiki WMA, Tanzania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1