Choosing the site to estimate bone mineral density with DXA method

T. Themeli, I. Triantafyllopoulos
{"title":"Choosing the site to estimate bone mineral density with DXA method","authors":"T. Themeli, I. Triantafyllopoulos","doi":"10.22540/JRPMS-05-079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic metabolic skeletal disease in which bone mass loss and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue occurs, leading to a reduction of bone strength and increased risk of fractures. This disease can be classified as primary or secondary due to a variety of causes, and has been shown to represent a major public health problem. Diagnosis of osteoporosis focuses on the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). It is considered to be the “gold standard” method of diagnosis and assesses bone mineral content (grams of hydroxyapatite) per area (cm) at prespecified sites of the axial and appendicular skeleton. As a result, the technique provides a two-dimensional image that is affected by the size of the bones, and does not provide a true (“volumetric”, mg/cm) density, since the relation between area and volume is non-linear. DXA is preferably performed on skeletal sites such as the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearms, where fracture risk is the highest. The measures provided by DXA are bone mineral content (BMC; in gr), bone area (in cm) and areal BMD (in gr/ cm). To diagnose osteoporosis, the results of areal BMD measurements obtained with DXA, should be reported as the difference in standard deviations (SD’s) with the “peak” bone mass, ie the mean mass of young individuals, thus producing a T-score. For females, three general diagnostic categories have been proposed by WHO, for assessments done with DEXA: normal (T-score -1 or above), low bone massosteopenia (T-score between -1 and -2.5) and osteoporosis (T-score -2.5 or below). BMD represents approximately 60-70% of bone strength of isolated bones in vitro and is used as a substitute measure of bone strength in fracture risk prediction.","PeriodicalId":348886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Practice on the Musculoskeletal System","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Practice on the Musculoskeletal System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JRPMS-05-079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic metabolic skeletal disease in which bone mass loss and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue occurs, leading to a reduction of bone strength and increased risk of fractures. This disease can be classified as primary or secondary due to a variety of causes, and has been shown to represent a major public health problem. Diagnosis of osteoporosis focuses on the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). It is considered to be the “gold standard” method of diagnosis and assesses bone mineral content (grams of hydroxyapatite) per area (cm) at prespecified sites of the axial and appendicular skeleton. As a result, the technique provides a two-dimensional image that is affected by the size of the bones, and does not provide a true (“volumetric”, mg/cm) density, since the relation between area and volume is non-linear. DXA is preferably performed on skeletal sites such as the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearms, where fracture risk is the highest. The measures provided by DXA are bone mineral content (BMC; in gr), bone area (in cm) and areal BMD (in gr/ cm). To diagnose osteoporosis, the results of areal BMD measurements obtained with DXA, should be reported as the difference in standard deviations (SD’s) with the “peak” bone mass, ie the mean mass of young individuals, thus producing a T-score. For females, three general diagnostic categories have been proposed by WHO, for assessments done with DEXA: normal (T-score -1 or above), low bone massosteopenia (T-score between -1 and -2.5) and osteoporosis (T-score -2.5 or below). BMD represents approximately 60-70% of bone strength of isolated bones in vitro and is used as a substitute measure of bone strength in fracture risk prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择用DXA法估算骨密度的部位
骨质疏松症被定义为一种全身性代谢性骨骼疾病,发生骨量丢失和骨组织微结构恶化,导致骨强度降低和骨折风险增加。由于各种原因,这种疾病可分为原发性或继发性,并已被证明是一个主要的公共卫生问题。骨质疏松症的诊断重点是使用双能x线吸收仪(DXA)评估骨矿物质密度(BMD)。它被认为是诊断的“金标准”方法,并评估骨矿物质含量(羟基磷灰石克数)每面积(厘米)在预先指定的轴骨和尾骨部位。因此,由于面积和体积之间的关系是非线性的,该技术提供的二维图像受骨骼大小的影响,并且不能提供真正的(“体积”,毫克/厘米)密度。DXA最好在骨折风险最高的骨骼部位,如腰椎、股骨近端和前臂远端进行。DXA提供的测量是骨矿物质含量(BMC;骨面积(厘米)和面积骨密度(克/厘米)。为了诊断骨质疏松症,使用DXA获得的面骨密度测量结果应报告为标准偏差(SD)与“峰值”骨量(即年轻人的平均骨量)的差异,从而产生t评分。对于女性,世卫组织提出了DEXA评估的三个一般诊断类别:正常(t评分为-1或以上),低骨量减少(t评分为-1至-2.5)和骨质疏松症(t评分为-2.5或以下)。骨密度约占体外离体骨骨强度的60-70%,在骨折风险预测中被用作骨强度的替代指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is it necessary to revise the metastatic spine surgery scores for lung cancer? A Review of the Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Fracture Healing Diagnostic methods of osteopenia and osteoporosis with the use of dental panoramic radiograph Cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporosis: an overview An Antegrade Soft Anchor in a Retrograde Drilling for Medial Meniscus Root Repair with High Tibial Osteotomy: A Modified Approach to Avoid Tunnel Collision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1