Students' Mathematical Communication: The Effectiveness of Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual Learning and Problem-Based Learning Model on Number Pattern

Meliana Handayani, S. F. 'Adna, Fadhilah Rahmawati
{"title":"Students' Mathematical Communication: The Effectiveness of Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual Learning and Problem-Based Learning Model on Number Pattern","authors":"Meliana Handayani, S. F. 'Adna, Fadhilah Rahmawati","doi":"10.37640/jim.v4i1.1615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual (SAVI) learning and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) models in improving students' mathematical communication ability compared to direct learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with the SAVI learning model implemented in experimental class 1, PBL in experimental class II, and direct learning in the control class. The sample was selected using cluster random sampling, and data were collected through observations, interviews, and tests. Hypothesis testing, including proportion tests, one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe tests, revealed the following results: (1) students taught with the SAVI learning model demonstrated significant improvement in mathematical communication ability; (2) students instructed using the PBL model also exhibited substantial enhancement in mathematical communication ability; (3) notable differences were observed among the SAVI learning, PBL, and direct learning models, highlighting the effectiveness of both the SAVI learning and PBL models in enhancing mathematical communication ability. Moreover, the PBL model outperformed direct learning, while the SAVI learning model showed greater effectiveness than direct learning. Overall, this study provides evidence supporting the efficacy of the SAVI learning and PBL models in fostering students' mathematical communication skills.","PeriodicalId":300273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Instructional Mathematics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Instructional Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v4i1.1615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual (SAVI) learning and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) models in improving students' mathematical communication ability compared to direct learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with the SAVI learning model implemented in experimental class 1, PBL in experimental class II, and direct learning in the control class. The sample was selected using cluster random sampling, and data were collected through observations, interviews, and tests. Hypothesis testing, including proportion tests, one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe tests, revealed the following results: (1) students taught with the SAVI learning model demonstrated significant improvement in mathematical communication ability; (2) students instructed using the PBL model also exhibited substantial enhancement in mathematical communication ability; (3) notable differences were observed among the SAVI learning, PBL, and direct learning models, highlighting the effectiveness of both the SAVI learning and PBL models in enhancing mathematical communication ability. Moreover, the PBL model outperformed direct learning, while the SAVI learning model showed greater effectiveness than direct learning. Overall, this study provides evidence supporting the efficacy of the SAVI learning and PBL models in fostering students' mathematical communication skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生数学交流:躯体学习、听觉学习、视觉学习、智力学习和问题学习模式对数字模式的影响
本研究旨在分析躯体、听觉、视觉、智力(SAVI)学习模式和基于问题的学习(PBL)模式相对于直接学习模式在提高学生数学沟通能力方面的效果。采用准实验设计,实验1班采用SAVI学习模式,实验2班采用PBL学习模式,对照组采用直接学习模式。样本采用整群随机抽样,通过观察、访谈、测试等方法收集数据。假设检验包括比例检验、单因素方差分析和Scheffe检验,结果显示:(1)采用SAVI学习模式的学生在数学沟通能力方面有显著提高;(2)采用PBL教学模式的学生在数学沟通能力上也有显著提高;(3) SAVI学习模式、PBL学习模式和直接学习模式之间存在显著差异,表明SAVI学习模式和PBL学习模式在提高数学沟通能力方面均有显著效果。PBL学习模式优于直接学习模式,SAVI学习模式优于直接学习模式。总体而言,本研究提供证据支持SAVI学习模式和PBL模式在培养学生数学沟通能力方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Trigonometry Material Using the Flipped Classroom Model The Influence of Mathematical Logical Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes in Linear Algebra Courses Note on Leonardo’s Combinatorial Approach Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning Models Assisted by Worksheets on Students' Critical Thinking Ability Strategy for Teaching Numerical Expressions through the Wordwall Platform for EJA Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1