Accuracy Computer-Guided Implant Placement using 3D Planning Software

G. Hakobyan
{"title":"Accuracy Computer-Guided Implant Placement using 3D Planning Software","authors":"G. Hakobyan","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-jdr-1(1)-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of implant treatment using computer 3D modeling and surgical guided.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent prosthodontics rehabilitation using dental implants in 2015-2020. 3D computer-aided modeling and surgical guide were used to plan the operation. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results, two groups were formed: In group A (included 75 patients, fully guided surgery), in group B (included 73 patients).\n\nResults: In patients Group A intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2% In patients Group B, intraoperative complications were recorded; membrane perforation 4, errors in the position of the implants 16, the inclination of the implants 18, fenestration 12, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6%. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) patients in Group A were significantly higher than patients in group B (p < 0.05). In patients Group A the average surgical time from time of anesthesia to the placement of the healing abutment was 10.6 ± 2.9 min per implant, in patients Group B, the average surgical time was 16.4 ± 1.5 min per implant.\n\nConclusion: The 3D modeling method and the controlled positioning of the implant allows surgical access with minimal trauma, reducing treatment time and complications.","PeriodicalId":129602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-jdr-1(1)-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of implant treatment using computer 3D modeling and surgical guided. Materials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent prosthodontics rehabilitation using dental implants in 2015-2020. 3D computer-aided modeling and surgical guide were used to plan the operation. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results, two groups were formed: In group A (included 75 patients, fully guided surgery), in group B (included 73 patients). Results: In patients Group A intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2% In patients Group B, intraoperative complications were recorded; membrane perforation 4, errors in the position of the implants 16, the inclination of the implants 18, fenestration 12, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6%. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) patients in Group A were significantly higher than patients in group B (p < 0.05). In patients Group A the average surgical time from time of anesthesia to the placement of the healing abutment was 10.6 ± 2.9 min per implant, in patients Group B, the average surgical time was 16.4 ± 1.5 min per implant. Conclusion: The 3D modeling method and the controlled positioning of the implant allows surgical access with minimal trauma, reducing treatment time and complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用3D规划软件精确计算机引导种植体放置
目的:评价计算机三维建模和手术引导下种植体治疗的效果。材料与方法:本研究纳入2015-2020年使用种植体进行口腔修复康复的148例患者。采用三维计算机辅助建模和手术指导进行手术规划。为对治疗结果进行比较分析,分为两组:a组(75例,全引导手术),B组(73例)。结果:A组患者术中或术后立即出现并发症(体位、倾斜度错误),侵犯解剖危险结构,3年后生存率为96.2%;B组患者术中出现并发症;膜穿孔4例,种植体位置错误16例,种植体倾斜18例,开窗12例,3年后成活率为97.6%。A组平均边缘骨质流失(MBL)显著高于B组(p < 0.05)。A组从麻醉时间到愈合基台放置的平均手术时间为10.6±2.9 min /个种植体,B组平均手术时间为16.4±1.5 min /个种植体。结论:三维建模方法和种植体的控制定位使手术进入创伤最小,减少了治疗时间和并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry- An update Dental Screening Examinations for Professional Baseball Players: Preventing Potential Loss of Athlete Playing Time Alveolar Osteitis: A Latest Review The International College of Dentists (ICD) and its Role in Humanitarian and Educational Aid The Use Of A Synthetic Putty Graft In Extraction Sockets Combined With Immediate Implant Installation: 3 Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1