The Optimization of Location Management

Xiwei Zhao, N. Pissinou, S. Makki
{"title":"The Optimization of Location Management","authors":"Xiwei Zhao, N. Pissinou, S. Makki","doi":"10.1109/CCNC.2007.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Binding and tracking are the two major phases of Location Management System (LMS). Thus, the communication costs during these two phases should be considered mostly for LMS optimization, without impairing the LMS performance. This paper describes a new optimization algorithm and, the key points of our improvement are: first, for each mobile terminal, we define more than one “anchor” node between its HLR and the serving VLR and construct a logical chain among all of them; second, the mobile terminal would memorize the current chain structure. Whenever the mobile terminal moves into a region served by a new VLR, the terminal will submit the chain structure which is saved in its memory to the new VLR. Then, the optimizing algorithm is conducted at the new VLR. The Records (that come from the terminal) and the routing information (of the new VLR) are used in the optimizing algorithm. The result of the optimization is a new chain structure in which the new VLR is one end of the chain, (the other end is always HLR of the terminal). After that, the new VLR updates the anchor chain according to the optimization result, and also downloads the new chain structure (the optimization result) to update the terminal’s memory. The binding cost and the tracking cost are both considered in the optimization algorithm. The complexity analysis shows that in the worst case, the total cost (binding plus tracking) with zero call blocking probability can be O(M), which is better than the latest result O(M·log(M)). Here, M is the distance that the terminal has moved. The simulation investigates the efficiency of our improvement with different CMR (Call-toMobility Ratio). Keywords-wireless network, cellular system, mobile computing, mobility management, location management, anchor chain.","PeriodicalId":166361,"journal":{"name":"2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2007.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Binding and tracking are the two major phases of Location Management System (LMS). Thus, the communication costs during these two phases should be considered mostly for LMS optimization, without impairing the LMS performance. This paper describes a new optimization algorithm and, the key points of our improvement are: first, for each mobile terminal, we define more than one “anchor” node between its HLR and the serving VLR and construct a logical chain among all of them; second, the mobile terminal would memorize the current chain structure. Whenever the mobile terminal moves into a region served by a new VLR, the terminal will submit the chain structure which is saved in its memory to the new VLR. Then, the optimizing algorithm is conducted at the new VLR. The Records (that come from the terminal) and the routing information (of the new VLR) are used in the optimizing algorithm. The result of the optimization is a new chain structure in which the new VLR is one end of the chain, (the other end is always HLR of the terminal). After that, the new VLR updates the anchor chain according to the optimization result, and also downloads the new chain structure (the optimization result) to update the terminal’s memory. The binding cost and the tracking cost are both considered in the optimization algorithm. The complexity analysis shows that in the worst case, the total cost (binding plus tracking) with zero call blocking probability can be O(M), which is better than the latest result O(M·log(M)). Here, M is the distance that the terminal has moved. The simulation investigates the efficiency of our improvement with different CMR (Call-toMobility Ratio). Keywords-wireless network, cellular system, mobile computing, mobility management, location management, anchor chain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位置管理的优化
绑定和跟踪是定位管理系统(LMS)的两个主要阶段。因此,这两个阶段的通信成本应该主要考虑LMS优化,而不影响LMS性能。本文提出了一种新的优化算法,改进的重点是:首先,对于每个移动终端,在其HLR和服务的VLR之间定义一个以上的“锚”节点,并构建它们之间的逻辑链;第二,移动终端会记忆当前的链结构。当移动终端移动到有新的VLR服务的区域时,终端会将存储在其内存中的链结构提交给新的VLR。然后,在新的VLR上进行优化算法。优化算法中使用了来自终端的记录和新VLR的路由信息。优化的结果是一个新的链结构,其中新的VLR是链的一端(另一端总是终端的HLR)。之后,新的VLR根据优化结果更新锚链,同时下载新的链结构(优化结果)更新终端内存。优化算法同时考虑了约束代价和跟踪代价。复杂度分析表明,在最坏情况下,调用阻塞概率为零的总成本(绑定加跟踪)为O(M),优于最新结果O(M·log(M))。这里M是终端移动的距离。仿真结果表明,在不同的CMR (Call-toMobility Ratio)条件下,改进算法的有效性得到了验证。关键词:无线网络,蜂窝系统,移动计算,移动管理,位置管理,锚链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utility Constrained Energy Minimization In Aloha Networks Ensuring Cache Freshness in On-Demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Network: A Cross-layer Framework Fuzzy Logic for Cross-layer Optimization in Cognitive Radio Networks Automated Trustworthiness Management for Database Software Components Combining VoiceXML with CCXML: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1