U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998.

Jun Zhang, M. Yancey, C. Henderson
{"title":"U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998.","authors":"Jun Zhang, M. Yancey, C. Henderson","doi":"10.1097/00006254-200208000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo examine the epidemiology of labor induction in the United States.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nWe used U.S. natality data from 1989 to 1998 and examined the rate of labor induction by year, geographic region, maternal characteristics and pregnancy complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween 1990 and 1998, the rate of labor induction increased from 9.5% to 19.4% of all births nationwide. However, the induction rate varied widely by state. White race, higher education and early initiation of prenatal care were associated with a higher rate of induction. For all gestational ages, a significantly increased induction rate occurred during the study period. The increase for clinically indicated induction was significantly slower than the overall increase, suggesting that elective induction has risen much more rapidly.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe rate of induction of labor more than doubled in the U.S. nationwide in the decade from 1989 to 1998. The increased use of labor induction may be attributable to both clinically indicated and elective induction.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"110","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200208000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 110

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the epidemiology of labor induction in the United States. STUDY DESIGN We used U.S. natality data from 1989 to 1998 and examined the rate of labor induction by year, geographic region, maternal characteristics and pregnancy complications. RESULTS Between 1990 and 1998, the rate of labor induction increased from 9.5% to 19.4% of all births nationwide. However, the induction rate varied widely by state. White race, higher education and early initiation of prenatal care were associated with a higher rate of induction. For all gestational ages, a significantly increased induction rate occurred during the study period. The increase for clinically indicated induction was significantly slower than the overall increase, suggesting that elective induction has risen much more rapidly. CONCLUSION The rate of induction of labor more than doubled in the U.S. nationwide in the decade from 1989 to 1998. The increased use of labor induction may be attributable to both clinically indicated and elective induction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国全国引产趋势,1989-1998年。
目的了解美国引产的流行病学。研究设计:我们使用美国1989 - 1998年的出生数据,按年份、地理区域、产妇特征和妊娠并发症检查引产率。结果1990 ~ 1998年,全国引产率由9.5%上升到19.4%。然而,不同州的诱导率差异很大。白人、高等教育和早期产前护理与较高的引产率相关。在研究期间,所有胎龄的诱导率都显著增加。临床指示诱导的增加明显慢于总体增长,这表明选择性诱导的增长要快得多。结论1989 - 1998年间,美国全国引产率增加了一倍以上。引产使用的增加可能归因于临床指征和择期引产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia. Timing of Referral to the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center: Does Referral with Molar Pregnancy Versus Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Affect Outcomes? Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Blood Contaminated Amniotic Fluid and the Lamellar Body Count Fetal Lung Maturity Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1