Leadership Behaviour in Covid-19 Crisis Response: A Personal Strategy Proposition

P. Rameshan
{"title":"Leadership Behaviour in Covid-19 Crisis Response: A Personal Strategy Proposition","authors":"P. Rameshan","doi":"10.1177/22779752221095277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the personal strategy driving COVID-19 crisis behaviours of 20 country leaders. It explains the concept of personal strategy and establishes its theoretical basis. It also reviews leaders’ COVID-19 action contexts, actions and associated dynamics to infer the personal strategy driving their behaviour. The article finds the best personal strategy for COVID-19 crisis management as ‘crisis resolution’ and its variants adopted by leaders with a track record in crisis management or facing serious political compulsions—the latter, with a ‘career turnaround’ motive, were focused on erasing unfavourable political image. Leaders following personal strategies of self or negative orientations were the least successful or most unpopular. The article categorizes personal strategies broadly as crisis-focused, negative-focused, ideology-focused and mixed-focused, and it shows that personal goals and personal strategies of country leaders could be interpreted with existing theories. Drawing from a previous study on the same 20 leaders, the article shows that personal strategy of ‘crisis-focus’ is associated with positive styles of crisis action and leader behaviour, ‘negative-focus’ is related to negative action and behavioural styles, and ‘mixed-focus’ is linked to ‘strategic’ actions and transactional behaviour. Except for ideology-focus, leaders’ choice of personal strategy is not found exclusively related to the developmental or geopolitical status of their countries, which proves that personal strategy is a leader phenomenon. Differences in personal strategy among leaders led to different results in different countries—positive orientation resulted in positive outcomes and negative focus caused negative outcomes. The article concludes that personal strategy as a medium of transmitting leader traits into leader behaviour through support of personal goal can fill the gap in the current literature in connecting personal traits to leader behaviour.","PeriodicalId":190206,"journal":{"name":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22779752221095277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper analyses the personal strategy driving COVID-19 crisis behaviours of 20 country leaders. It explains the concept of personal strategy and establishes its theoretical basis. It also reviews leaders’ COVID-19 action contexts, actions and associated dynamics to infer the personal strategy driving their behaviour. The article finds the best personal strategy for COVID-19 crisis management as ‘crisis resolution’ and its variants adopted by leaders with a track record in crisis management or facing serious political compulsions—the latter, with a ‘career turnaround’ motive, were focused on erasing unfavourable political image. Leaders following personal strategies of self or negative orientations were the least successful or most unpopular. The article categorizes personal strategies broadly as crisis-focused, negative-focused, ideology-focused and mixed-focused, and it shows that personal goals and personal strategies of country leaders could be interpreted with existing theories. Drawing from a previous study on the same 20 leaders, the article shows that personal strategy of ‘crisis-focus’ is associated with positive styles of crisis action and leader behaviour, ‘negative-focus’ is related to negative action and behavioural styles, and ‘mixed-focus’ is linked to ‘strategic’ actions and transactional behaviour. Except for ideology-focus, leaders’ choice of personal strategy is not found exclusively related to the developmental or geopolitical status of their countries, which proves that personal strategy is a leader phenomenon. Differences in personal strategy among leaders led to different results in different countries—positive orientation resulted in positive outcomes and negative focus caused negative outcomes. The article concludes that personal strategy as a medium of transmitting leader traits into leader behaviour through support of personal goal can fill the gap in the current literature in connecting personal traits to leader behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19危机应对中的领导行为:个人战略主张
本文分析了驱动20个国家领导人COVID-19危机行为的个人策略。阐述了个人策略的概念,建立了个人策略的理论基础。它还审查了领导人的COVID-19行动背景、行动和相关动态,以推断驱动其行为的个人战略。本文发现,应对COVID-19危机管理的最佳个人策略是“危机解决”,以及具有危机管理记录或面临严重政治压力的领导人采用的各种策略——后者出于“职业转型”动机,专注于消除不利的政治形象。遵循自我或消极导向的个人策略的领导者是最不成功或最不受欢迎的。本文将个人战略大致分为危机聚焦型、消极聚焦型、意识形态聚焦型和混合聚焦型,并表明国家领导人的个人目标和个人战略可以用现有的理论来解释。根据之前对这20位领导者的研究,这篇文章表明,“危机关注”的个人战略与积极的危机行动和领导行为风格有关,“消极关注”与消极的行动和行为风格有关,“混合关注”与“战略”行动和交易行为有关。除了意识形态关注外,领导人的个人战略选择并不仅仅与国家的发展或地缘政治状况有关,这证明了个人战略是一种领导者现象。领导者个人策略的差异导致不同国家的结果不同,积极的导向导致积极的结果,消极的关注导致消极的结果。本文认为,个人战略作为一种通过支持个人目标将领导特质转化为领导行为的媒介,填补了目前文献中将个人特质与领导行为联系起来的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investor Impulsivity and Mental Accounting: A Gender-Centric Investigation Revisiting the Scope of Section 35ABB of the Income Tax Act Institutional Pressure and Business Sustainable Performance: Does Environmental Management Accounting Matter? The Regulatory Role of Organizational Identification in the Effect of Pygmalion on the Cyberslacking Behaviour of Hotel Businesses Employees Creating Awareness for Sustainable Goals: Reading Ruskin Bond’s Short Stories Through Bioregionalism Lenses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1