The Ontology of Stories

A. Takada
{"title":"The Ontology of Stories","authors":"A. Takada","doi":"10.4288/KISORON.44.1-2_35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues for the event view of the story. According to the event view, stories are the specific type of complex events. Another competitor is the content view, according to which stories are abstract contents. First, I explain the event view is an attractive option for narrative approach in philosophy. Narrative approach regards lives as narratives. We can understand this, considering lives as the same type events as stories. Next, I argue that the event view can explain the identity of stories. The same story could be retold in different media with different details. The content view has trouble explaining that. Finally, in the case of fictional narratives, retelling of stories is amounts to trans-work transposition of fictional entities. This position is quite simple and respects much intution.","PeriodicalId":331954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4288/KISORON.44.1-2_35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper argues for the event view of the story. According to the event view, stories are the specific type of complex events. Another competitor is the content view, according to which stories are abstract contents. First, I explain the event view is an attractive option for narrative approach in philosophy. Narrative approach regards lives as narratives. We can understand this, considering lives as the same type events as stories. Next, I argue that the event view can explain the identity of stories. The same story could be retold in different media with different details. The content view has trouble explaining that. Finally, in the case of fictional narratives, retelling of stories is amounts to trans-work transposition of fictional entities. This position is quite simple and respects much intution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
故事的本体论
本文支持故事的事件观。根据事件视图,故事是复杂事件的特定类型。另一个竞争对手是内容观,根据内容观,故事是抽象的内容。首先,我解释了事件观是哲学叙事方法的一个有吸引力的选择。叙事方法将生活视为叙事。我们可以理解这一点,将生活视为与故事相同类型的事件。接下来,我认为事件观可以解释故事的身份。同样的故事可以在不同的媒体上以不同的细节被重述。内容视图很难解释这一点。最后,在虚构叙事的情况下,故事的复述相当于虚构实体的跨作品转换。这个姿势很简单,很尊重直觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
現代数学の歩み60年 : 代数幾何学の歩みを中心にして( 「数学と論理学の60年」) 『科学基礎論研究』に見られる「形式主義観」( 「数学と論理学の60年」) 金子洋之『ダメットにたどりつくまで:反実在論とは何か』への批判 形而上学の排除から復権まで : 哲学と数学・論理学の60年( 「数学と論理学の60年」) Deductive Inference as Indirect Verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1