Avian Abundance, Diversity and Conservation Status in Etago Sub-County Kisii County Kenya

Mokono M. Isaac, S. Muya, Winnie Kiiru, M. Muchai
{"title":"Avian Abundance, Diversity and Conservation Status in Etago Sub-County Kisii County Kenya","authors":"Mokono M. Isaac, S. Muya, Winnie Kiiru, M. Muchai","doi":"10.4236/OJE.2019.95013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bird’s species diversity and abundance are being threatened due to agricultural activities and anthropogenic practices which causes habitat destruction and fragmentation. Understanding how avian species respond to habitat destruction is important towards development of effective measures to ensure that the environment is protected. A study on avian abundance, diversity and conservation status was conducted in Etago Sub-County, Kisii County Kenya from September 2018 to February 2019. Point counts and time species counts were used to carry out birds’ survey to determine their abundance and diversity in the secondary forest, sugarcane plantations, human settlement and mixed firms. A total of 4992 individuals were observed and recorded in the entire study area. The human settlement had the highest density of 1.664 ± 0.18 birds/ha followed by sugarcane plantation with 1.092 ± 0.16 birds/ha and Nyangweta secondary forest was third with 0.0819 ± 0.13. Mixed firms had the least density of 0.95 ± 0.017 bird/ha. Further Dunn’s multiple comparisons test showed that Mixed farming and forest had no significant difference and had mean rank difference of 11.37. In mixed farming vs human settlement there was a significant difference with a mean rank difference of 57.38; in mixed farming vs sugarcane farms there was no significant difference; in the four habitats, 114 species of birds were cumulatively recorded. Out of these, 106 species were recorded in the secondary forests, 98 human settlement and 87 species in the sugarcane plantations and 55 in mixed farms. There was a significant difference in bird diversity in the four habitats where Secondary forest had the highest diversity of 3.85 and sugarcane plantations had a diversity of 3.71 while human settlement and mixed firms had lower diversities of 2.6 and 2.5 respectively (df1 = 2, df2 = 0.0 F = 0.00001, P = 0.00001).","PeriodicalId":265480,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Ecology","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJE.2019.95013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Bird’s species diversity and abundance are being threatened due to agricultural activities and anthropogenic practices which causes habitat destruction and fragmentation. Understanding how avian species respond to habitat destruction is important towards development of effective measures to ensure that the environment is protected. A study on avian abundance, diversity and conservation status was conducted in Etago Sub-County, Kisii County Kenya from September 2018 to February 2019. Point counts and time species counts were used to carry out birds’ survey to determine their abundance and diversity in the secondary forest, sugarcane plantations, human settlement and mixed firms. A total of 4992 individuals were observed and recorded in the entire study area. The human settlement had the highest density of 1.664 ± 0.18 birds/ha followed by sugarcane plantation with 1.092 ± 0.16 birds/ha and Nyangweta secondary forest was third with 0.0819 ± 0.13. Mixed firms had the least density of 0.95 ± 0.017 bird/ha. Further Dunn’s multiple comparisons test showed that Mixed farming and forest had no significant difference and had mean rank difference of 11.37. In mixed farming vs human settlement there was a significant difference with a mean rank difference of 57.38; in mixed farming vs sugarcane farms there was no significant difference; in the four habitats, 114 species of birds were cumulatively recorded. Out of these, 106 species were recorded in the secondary forests, 98 human settlement and 87 species in the sugarcane plantations and 55 in mixed farms. There was a significant difference in bird diversity in the four habitats where Secondary forest had the highest diversity of 3.85 and sugarcane plantations had a diversity of 3.71 while human settlement and mixed firms had lower diversities of 2.6 and 2.5 respectively (df1 = 2, df2 = 0.0 F = 0.00001, P = 0.00001).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚基西县埃塔戈县鸟类丰度、多样性及保护现状
由于农业活动和人为活动导致栖息地破坏和破碎化,鸟类的物种多样性和丰度受到威胁。了解鸟类对栖息地破坏的反应,对于制定有效措施以确保环境得到保护具有重要意义。2018年9月至2019年2月,在肯尼亚基希县埃塔戈县开展了鸟类丰度、多样性和保护现状研究。采用点计数法和时间计数法对次生林、甘蔗种植园、人类住区和混合企业的鸟类进行了调查,确定了鸟类的丰度和多样性。整个研究区共观察记录了4992只个体。人类住区鸟类密度最高,为1.664±0.18只/ha,其次是甘蔗人工林,为1.092±0.16只/ha,其次是Nyangweta次生林,为0.0819±0.13只/ha。混合公司密度最小,为0.95±0.017只/ha。进一步的Dunn多重比较检验表明,农林混作间差异不显著,平均秩差为11.37。混合农业与人类住区存在显著性差异,平均等级差为57.38;混合种植与甘蔗种植没有显著差异;在4个生境中,累计记录鸟类114种。其中次生林有106种,人类住区有98种,甘蔗种植园有87种,混合农场有55种。4种生境鸟类多样性差异显著,次生林和甘蔗人工林的多样性最高,分别为3.85和3.71,人类住区和混合企业的多样性最低,分别为2.6和2.5 (df1 = 2, df2 = 0.0, F = 0.00001, P = 0.00001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
City Communal Aspiration System—City without Chimneys Spatial Zonation and Diversity of Bivalves and Gastropods in Mangrove Forests of Casiguran, Aurora Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.), Waste Streams, Characterisation and Valorisation: An Overview Chihuahuan Desert Soil Biota Dynamic of Mangrove Associated Molluscs in Anthropized Areas of the Cameroon Coastline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1