An experimental performance analysis of image reconstruction techniques under both Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise models

K. Thakulsukanant, W. Lee, V. Patanavijit
{"title":"An experimental performance analysis of image reconstruction techniques under both Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise models","authors":"K. Thakulsukanant, W. Lee, V. Patanavijit","doi":"10.1109/KST.2012.6287738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the images reconstruction approaches are very essential in digital image processing (DIP), especially in terms of removing the noise contaminations and recovering the content of images. Each image reconstruction approach has different mathematical models. Therefore a performance of individual reconstruction approach is varied depending on several factors such as image characteristic, reconstruction mathematical model, noise model and noise intensity. Thus, this paper presents comprehensive experiments based on the comparisons of various reconstruction approaches under Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise models. The employing reconstruction approaches in this experiment are Inverse Filter, Wiener Filter, Regularized approach, Lucy-Richardson (L-R) approach, and Bayesian approach applied on mean, median, myriad, meridian filters together with several regularization techniques (such as non-regularization, Laplacian regularized, Markov Random Field (MRF) regularization, and one-side Bi-Total Variation (OS-BTV) regularization). Three standard images of Lena, Resolution Chart, and Susie (40th) are used for testing in this experiment. Noise models of Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), Poisson, Salt&Pepper, and Speckle of various intensities are used to contaminate all these images. The comparison is done by varying the parameters of each approach until the best peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is obtained. Therefore, PSNR plays a vital parameter for comparisons all the results of individual approaches.","PeriodicalId":209504,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KST.2012.6287738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recently, the images reconstruction approaches are very essential in digital image processing (DIP), especially in terms of removing the noise contaminations and recovering the content of images. Each image reconstruction approach has different mathematical models. Therefore a performance of individual reconstruction approach is varied depending on several factors such as image characteristic, reconstruction mathematical model, noise model and noise intensity. Thus, this paper presents comprehensive experiments based on the comparisons of various reconstruction approaches under Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise models. The employing reconstruction approaches in this experiment are Inverse Filter, Wiener Filter, Regularized approach, Lucy-Richardson (L-R) approach, and Bayesian approach applied on mean, median, myriad, meridian filters together with several regularization techniques (such as non-regularization, Laplacian regularized, Markov Random Field (MRF) regularization, and one-side Bi-Total Variation (OS-BTV) regularization). Three standard images of Lena, Resolution Chart, and Susie (40th) are used for testing in this experiment. Noise models of Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), Poisson, Salt&Pepper, and Speckle of various intensities are used to contaminate all these images. The comparison is done by varying the parameters of each approach until the best peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is obtained. Therefore, PSNR plays a vital parameter for comparisons all the results of individual approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高斯和非高斯噪声模型下图像重建技术的实验性能分析
近年来,图像重建方法在数字图像处理(DIP)中非常重要,特别是在去除噪声污染和恢复图像内容方面。每种图像重建方法都有不同的数学模型。因此,单个重建方法的性能取决于图像特性、重建数学模型、噪声模型和噪声强度等因素。因此,本文在比较高斯和非高斯噪声模型下各种重构方法的基础上,进行了综合实验。本实验采用的重构方法有逆滤波、维纳滤波、正则化方法、Lucy-Richardson (L-R)方法和贝叶斯方法,这些方法应用于均值、中值、无数、子络滤波器,并结合几种正则化技术(如非正则化、拉普拉斯正则化、马尔可夫随机场(MRF)正则化和单边双全变差(OS-BTV)正则化)。本实验使用Lena、Resolution Chart和Susie(40)三张标准图像进行测试。采用加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)、泊松噪声(Poisson)、盐胡椒噪声(Salt&Pepper)、散斑噪声(Speckle)等不同强度的噪声模型对这些图像进行污染。通过改变每种方法的参数进行比较,直到获得最佳峰值信噪比(PSNR)。因此,PSNR是比较各个方法的所有结果的重要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental study efficiency of robust models of Lucas-Kanade optical flow algorithms in the present of Non-Gaussian Noise Training a single multiplicative neuron with a harmony search algorithm for prediction of S&P500 index - An extensive performance evaluation A combined semantic social network analysis framework to integrate social media data Automatic traffic estimation system using mobile probe vehicles Pupil extraction system for Nystagmus diagnosis by using K-mean clustering and Mahalanobis distance technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1