Modelling surface roughness in finish turning as a function of cutting tool geometry using the response surface method, Gaussian process regression and decision tree regression

D. Vukelić, K. Simunovic, Ž. Kanović, T. Šarić, K. Doroslovacki, M. Prica, G. Simunovic
{"title":"Modelling surface roughness in finish turning as a function of cutting tool geometry using the response surface method, Gaussian process regression and decision tree regression","authors":"D. Vukelić, K. Simunovic, Ž. Kanović, T. Šarić, K. Doroslovacki, M. Prica, G. Simunovic","doi":"10.14743/apem2022.3.442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the modelling of arithmetical mean roughness after turning of C45 steel was performed. Four parameters of cutting tool geometry were varied, i.e.: corner radius r, approach angle κ, rake angle γ and inclination angle λ. After turning, the arithmetical mean roughness Ra was measured. The obtained values of Ra ranged from 0.13 μm to 4.39 μm. The results of the experiments showed that surface roughness improves with increasing corner radius, increasing approach angle, increasing rake angle, and decreasing inclination angle. Based on the experimental results, models were developed to predict the distribution of the arithmetical mean roughness using the response surface method (RSM), Gaussian process regression with two kernel functions, the sequential exponential function (GPR-SE) and Mattern (GPR-Mat), and decision tree regression (DTR). The maximum percentage errors of the developed models were 3.898 %, 1.192 %, 1.364 %, and 0.960 % for DTR, GPR-SE, GPR-Mat, and RSM, respectively. In the worst case, the maximum absolute errors were 0.106 μm, 0.017 μm, 0.019 μm, and 0.011 μm for DTR, GPR-SE, GPR-Mat, and RSM, respectively. The results and the obtained errors show that the developed models can be successfully used for surface roughness prediction.","PeriodicalId":445710,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2022.3.442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, the modelling of arithmetical mean roughness after turning of C45 steel was performed. Four parameters of cutting tool geometry were varied, i.e.: corner radius r, approach angle κ, rake angle γ and inclination angle λ. After turning, the arithmetical mean roughness Ra was measured. The obtained values of Ra ranged from 0.13 μm to 4.39 μm. The results of the experiments showed that surface roughness improves with increasing corner radius, increasing approach angle, increasing rake angle, and decreasing inclination angle. Based on the experimental results, models were developed to predict the distribution of the arithmetical mean roughness using the response surface method (RSM), Gaussian process regression with two kernel functions, the sequential exponential function (GPR-SE) and Mattern (GPR-Mat), and decision tree regression (DTR). The maximum percentage errors of the developed models were 3.898 %, 1.192 %, 1.364 %, and 0.960 % for DTR, GPR-SE, GPR-Mat, and RSM, respectively. In the worst case, the maximum absolute errors were 0.106 μm, 0.017 μm, 0.019 μm, and 0.011 μm for DTR, GPR-SE, GPR-Mat, and RSM, respectively. The results and the obtained errors show that the developed models can be successfully used for surface roughness prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用响应面法、高斯过程回归和决策树回归对精加工车削过程中的表面粗糙度作为刀具几何形状的函数进行建模
本文对C45钢车削后的算术平均粗糙度进行了建模。改变了刀具几何形状的4个参数,即转角半径r、接近角κ、前倾角γ和倾角λ。车削后,测量算术平均粗糙度Ra。得到的Ra值范围为0.13 ~ 4.39 μm。实验结果表明,表面粗糙度随转角半径、接近角、前倾角和倾角的增大而增大。基于实验结果,采用响应面法(RSM)、序列指数函数(GPR-SE)和Mattern (GPR-Mat)两核函数高斯过程回归和决策树回归(DTR)建立了预测算术平均粗糙度分布的模型。DTR、GPR-SE、GPR-Mat和RSM模型的最大误差百分比分别为3.898%、1.192%、1.364%和0.960%。在最坏情况下,DTR、GPR-SE、GPR-Mat和RSM的最大绝对误差分别为0.106 μm、0.017 μm、0.019 μm和0.011 μm。结果表明,所建立的模型可以成功地用于表面粗糙度预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing smart manufacturing systems using digital twin IoT-based Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) algorithm for voltage stability control and monitoring of solar power generation Reduction of surface defects by optimization of casting speed using genetic programming: An industrial case study Incentive modeling analysis in engineering applications and projects with stochastic duration time Comparing Fault Tree Analysis methods combined with Generalized Grey Relation Analysis: A new approach and case study in the automotive industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1