Prescription Drug Coverage and Elderly Medicare Spending

Baoping Shang, D. Goldman
{"title":"Prescription Drug Coverage and Elderly Medicare Spending","authors":"Baoping Shang, D. Goldman","doi":"10.3386/W13358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of Medicare Part D has generated interest in the cost of providing drug coverage to the elderly. Of paramount importance -- often unaccounted for in budget estimates -- are the salutary effects that increased prescription drug use might have on other Medicare spending. This paper uses longitudinal data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to estimate how prescription drug benefits affect Medicare spending. We compare spending and service use for Medigap enrollees with and without drug coverage. Because of concerns about selection, we use variation in supply-side regulations of the individual insurance market -- including guaranteed issue and community rating -- as instruments for prescription drug coverage. We employ a discrete factor model to control for individual-level heterogeneity that might induce bias in the effects of drug coverage. Medigap prescription drug coverage increases drug spending by $170 or 22%, and reduces Medicare Part A spending by $350 or 13% (in 2000 dollars). Medigap prescription drug coverage reduces Medicare Part B spending, but the estimates are not statistically significant. Overall, a $1 increase in prescription drug spending is associated with a $2.06 reduction in Medicare spending. Furthermore, the substitution effect decreases as income rises, and thus provides support for the low-income assistance program of Medicare Part D.","PeriodicalId":238933,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W13358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

The introduction of Medicare Part D has generated interest in the cost of providing drug coverage to the elderly. Of paramount importance -- often unaccounted for in budget estimates -- are the salutary effects that increased prescription drug use might have on other Medicare spending. This paper uses longitudinal data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to estimate how prescription drug benefits affect Medicare spending. We compare spending and service use for Medigap enrollees with and without drug coverage. Because of concerns about selection, we use variation in supply-side regulations of the individual insurance market -- including guaranteed issue and community rating -- as instruments for prescription drug coverage. We employ a discrete factor model to control for individual-level heterogeneity that might induce bias in the effects of drug coverage. Medigap prescription drug coverage increases drug spending by $170 or 22%, and reduces Medicare Part A spending by $350 or 13% (in 2000 dollars). Medigap prescription drug coverage reduces Medicare Part B spending, but the estimates are not statistically significant. Overall, a $1 increase in prescription drug spending is associated with a $2.06 reduction in Medicare spending. Furthermore, the substitution effect decreases as income rises, and thus provides support for the low-income assistance program of Medicare Part D.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处方药覆盖范围和老年人医疗保险支出
医疗保险D部分的引入引起了人们对向老年人提供药品保险费用的兴趣。最重要的是,增加处方药使用可能对其他医疗保险支出产生的有益影响,这在预算估计中往往没有考虑到。本文使用医疗保险现行受益人调查(MCBS)的纵向数据来估计处方药福利如何影响医疗保险支出。我们比较了医疗保险计划参保人和没有参保人的支出和服务使用情况。出于对选择的考虑,我们使用了个人保险市场供给侧监管的变化——包括担保发行和社区评级——作为处方药覆盖的工具。我们采用离散因素模型来控制可能导致药物覆盖效应偏差的个体水平异质性。美国医疗保险计划处方药覆盖范围使药品支出增加170美元或22%,并使医疗保险A部分支出减少350美元或13%(以2000年美元计算)。医疗保险处方药覆盖减少了医疗保险B部分的支出,但估计在统计上并不显著。总的来说,处方药支出每增加1美元,医疗保险支出就会减少2.06美元。此外,替代效应随着收入的增加而降低,从而为医疗保险D部分的低收入援助计划提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of an Employer Health Insurance Mandate on Health Insurance Coverage and the Demand for Labor: Evidence from Hawaii Sophistication and Insurance: Asymmetric Information, the Ability to Game the System, and Prescription Drug Insurance Development of Scenarios for Health Expenditure in the New EU Member States: Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia Why Don't Docs Digitize? The Adoption of Health Information Technology in Primary Care Medicine A Presentation: Issues Pertaining to Part-Year and Full-Year Health Insurance Coverage Gaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1