Analyzing the Highways of Money: The Case of 2014. Crisis

Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Arsov
{"title":"Analyzing the Highways of Money: The Case of 2014. Crisis","authors":"Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Arsov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2499191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current crisis has triggered significant debate concerning economic theory and policy. Largely absent from this debate is an informed discussion of the methods used by economists in analysing the economy and formulating their proposals. But method matters. This study challenges the notion that there is an “adversary system” within the context of debt, crisis and capital increase. The findings suggest that no such adversary system exists for most defendants in consumer debt cases. Instead, these cases exist. We argue theory and practice on 2014. United Internet capital increase case.","PeriodicalId":376458,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current crisis has triggered significant debate concerning economic theory and policy. Largely absent from this debate is an informed discussion of the methods used by economists in analysing the economy and formulating their proposals. But method matters. This study challenges the notion that there is an “adversary system” within the context of debt, crisis and capital increase. The findings suggest that no such adversary system exists for most defendants in consumer debt cases. Instead, these cases exist. We argue theory and practice on 2014. United Internet capital increase case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析金钱的高速公路:以2014年为例。危机
当前的危机引发了有关经济理论和政策的重大辩论。这场辩论基本上没有对经济学家在分析经济和提出建议时所使用的方法进行明智的讨论。但方法很重要。这项研究挑战了在债务、危机和资本增加的背景下存在“对手系统”的概念。调查结果表明,在消费者债务案件中,大多数被告不存在这样的对手制度。相反,这些情况确实存在。我们对2014年进行了理论与实践的争论。联合互联网增资案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Drives Variation in the U.S. Debt/Output Ratio? The Dogs that Didn't Bark Value Recovery Instruments: A Contrarian Proposition 재원조달 방법을 고려한 재정지출 효과 분석 : 미국의 사례를 중심으로 (Estimating Fiscal Multiplier: Do Financing Methods Matter?) Sovereign debt dynamics with serial defaults Policy Brief: Design Choices in Sovereign Asset Management Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1