Comparison Learning Model Air and Tai Combined With Cognitive Conflict Strategy Againts Active Learning and Concept Understanding

D. Ferdiansyah, S. Patmanthara, I. Zaeni
{"title":"Comparison Learning Model Air and Tai Combined With Cognitive Conflict Strategy Againts Active Learning and Concept Understanding","authors":"D. Ferdiansyah, S. Patmanthara, I. Zaeni","doi":"10.17977/UM047V27I12020P027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract :  There are several problems in the learning process of Basic Electricity and Electronics at SMK Negeri 8 Malang, including: (1) When learning takes place students do not pay attention and listen to the teacher when delivering material, (2) The teacher does not focus on learning activities to students, (3) Students are less active in asking and expressing his opinion about the material that has been taught. This study uses a variety of learning models and methods that can improve students' learning activeness and conceptual understanding, namely the Auditory, Intellectual, Repetition (AIR) learning model and the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, each of which is combined with cognitive conflict strategies. The research design used a quasi experimental design with a non-equivalent control group design type. The data analysis technique consisted of normality test, homogeneity test, two mean similarity test, and hypothesis testing. The conclusion of this study is that the AIR learning model combined with cognitive conflict strategies is superior to the TAI learning model combined with cognitive conflict strategies","PeriodicalId":432873,"journal":{"name":"JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM047V27I12020P027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract :  There are several problems in the learning process of Basic Electricity and Electronics at SMK Negeri 8 Malang, including: (1) When learning takes place students do not pay attention and listen to the teacher when delivering material, (2) The teacher does not focus on learning activities to students, (3) Students are less active in asking and expressing his opinion about the material that has been taught. This study uses a variety of learning models and methods that can improve students' learning activeness and conceptual understanding, namely the Auditory, Intellectual, Repetition (AIR) learning model and the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, each of which is combined with cognitive conflict strategies. The research design used a quasi experimental design with a non-equivalent control group design type. The data analysis technique consisted of normality test, homogeneity test, two mean similarity test, and hypothesis testing. The conclusion of this study is that the AIR learning model combined with cognitive conflict strategies is superior to the TAI learning model combined with cognitive conflict strategies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较学习模式Air与Tai结合认知冲突策略对抗主动学习与概念理解
摘要:在SMK Negeri 8 Malang的基础电学和电子学的学习过程中存在几个问题,包括:(1)学生在学习时没有注意听老师讲课;(2)老师没有把注意力集中在学生的学习活动上;(3)学生对所教材料的提问和表达意见的积极性较低。本研究采用了多种可以提高学生学习积极性和概念理解的学习模式和方法,即听觉、智力、重复(AIR)学习模式和团队辅助个性化(TAI)学习模式,每种学习模式都与认知冲突策略相结合。研究设计采用准实验设计,非等效对照组设计类型。数据分析方法包括正态性检验、齐性检验、二均值相似检验和假设检验。本研究的结论是,AIR学习模式结合认知冲突策略优于TAI学习模式结合认知冲突策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Children's Learning Happiness Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Pandemic PjBL-MOOCs As Future Models for Vocational High Schools Disrupting Higher Education: Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia and the United States Need Assessment For Developing An Online English Proficiency Test Instrument In Higher Education During Covid-19 Pandemic Good Teachers: Indonesia’s Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1