A Comparative Study of University and Private Language Institute EFL Teachers' Familiarity with and Classroom Practicality Perceptions of Dynamic Assessment

Musa Nushi, A. Momeni
{"title":"A Comparative Study of University and Private Language Institute EFL Teachers' Familiarity with and Classroom Practicality Perceptions of Dynamic Assessment","authors":"Musa Nushi, A. Momeni","doi":"10.26907/esd.17.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread prevalence of dynamic tools to assess English language achievement has led to burgeoning research on exploring different aspects of teachers' beliefs toward Dynamic Assessment (DA). In the educational system of Iran, experts and researchers who have undergone second language education may verify that there is very little, if any, attention given to the perceptions held by instructors and teachers regarding Dynamic Assessment (DA). In an attempt to remedy this gap, the current study aimed to investigate the familiarity with DA of Iranian EFL teachers working in two educational settings (e.g., language institutes and universities). The study also set out to explore the teachers' attitudes toward the practicality of DA in the two settings. To address the research questions, a sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed. The instruments of this study comprised a questionnaire and an Email interview with 12 ELT assessment experts in order to have their interpretations of the research findings. The results of the t-tests showed no significant difference between the two groups of teachers in terms of their familiarity with DA and their attitudes toward the practicality of DA in the two contexts. In addition, content analysis of the Email interview data revealed that the ELT assessment experts' primary arguments for the insignificant difference between the two groups in terms of the two variables related to the fact that DA has remained at the theoretical level, that there is a lack of teacher training in DA and the strict rules of Iran's educational system which prohibit teachers from applying DA principles and procedures in their classes. The implications of the findings for teacher education, materials development as well as for program administrators, EFL teachers, and learners will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":158711,"journal":{"name":"Education & Self Development","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education & Self Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread prevalence of dynamic tools to assess English language achievement has led to burgeoning research on exploring different aspects of teachers' beliefs toward Dynamic Assessment (DA). In the educational system of Iran, experts and researchers who have undergone second language education may verify that there is very little, if any, attention given to the perceptions held by instructors and teachers regarding Dynamic Assessment (DA). In an attempt to remedy this gap, the current study aimed to investigate the familiarity with DA of Iranian EFL teachers working in two educational settings (e.g., language institutes and universities). The study also set out to explore the teachers' attitudes toward the practicality of DA in the two settings. To address the research questions, a sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed. The instruments of this study comprised a questionnaire and an Email interview with 12 ELT assessment experts in order to have their interpretations of the research findings. The results of the t-tests showed no significant difference between the two groups of teachers in terms of their familiarity with DA and their attitudes toward the practicality of DA in the two contexts. In addition, content analysis of the Email interview data revealed that the ELT assessment experts' primary arguments for the insignificant difference between the two groups in terms of the two variables related to the fact that DA has remained at the theoretical level, that there is a lack of teacher training in DA and the strict rules of Iran's educational system which prohibit teachers from applying DA principles and procedures in their classes. The implications of the findings for teacher education, materials development as well as for program administrators, EFL teachers, and learners will be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学与私立语言学院教师对动态评价的熟悉程度及课堂实践性认知的比较研究
动态评估英语语言成就的工具的广泛流行,导致了探索教师对动态评估(DA)的不同看法的研究蓬勃发展。在伊朗的教育系统中,接受过第二语言教育的专家和研究人员可能会证实,如果有的话,很少关注指导员和教师对动态评估(DA)的看法。为了弥补这一差距,本研究旨在调查在两种教育环境(如语言学院和大学)工作的伊朗英语教师对DA的熟悉程度。本研究还探讨了两种情境下教师对数据发展的实践性的态度。为了解决研究问题,采用顺序解释混合方法设计。本研究的工具包括问卷调查和电子邮件采访12位英语教学评估专家,以获得他们对研究结果的解释。t检验结果显示,两组教师对数据分析的熟悉程度和对数据分析在两种情境下的实用性的态度均无显著差异。此外,对Email访谈数据的内容分析显示,对于两组在两个变量上的差异不显著,英语教学评估专家的主要论据与数据挖掘停留在理论层面、缺乏对数据挖掘的教师培训以及伊朗教育制度的严格规定禁止教师在课堂上应用数据挖掘的原则和程序有关。研究结果对教师教育、教材开发、项目管理者、英语教师和学习者的影响将被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shock Innovation: Conceptualisation of Digital Transformation in Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic Teacher Professional Development and Media Education in a Virtual Learning Environment Predicting Student Employment in Teacher Education Using Machine Learning Algorithms E-learning Issues in Online Marathon Application for Teaching a Foreign Language to Hard of Hearing Students The Connection of the Digital Learning Component with the Development of Preschool and School-age Children: A Review of Research and International Educational Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1