On forensic economist specific expertise

A. Horlachuk
{"title":"On forensic economist specific expertise","authors":"A. Horlachuk","doi":"10.32353/khrife.2.2021.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectiveness level of the practical activities of forensic economists to some extent depends on theoretical validity of specific expertise and their clear regulation by law. \nThis article purpose is to investigate the essence of special economic knowledge, to determine the boundaries of competence of forensic economists. While generalizing scientific content, the main systemic elements that reflect essence of special economic knowledge their forms, structure, characteristic features are considered. \nWith the help of methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization, effectiveness dependence of the use of special economic knowledge and their relevance on the conditions of economic environment has been established. It was found that economic knowledge based on theoretical principles of economic sciences should be of a practical, applied nature, which makes appropriate requirements for organization of the educational procedure while professional training of persons entitled to conduct forensic economic examinations. In turn, the level of personal competence of a forensic economist depends on his practical skills and abilities and improves as more complex expert researches is carried out. \nIt has been established that it is impossible for forensic economists to study issues that go beyond specific expertise scope and have a legal nature (establishing the circle of culpability of persons, interpreting norms of law, legal assessment of the actions of persons, including the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships between targeted actions and the resulting negative consequences) which deprives the forensic examination of the status of objective economic research.","PeriodicalId":340932,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2021.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectiveness level of the practical activities of forensic economists to some extent depends on theoretical validity of specific expertise and their clear regulation by law. This article purpose is to investigate the essence of special economic knowledge, to determine the boundaries of competence of forensic economists. While generalizing scientific content, the main systemic elements that reflect essence of special economic knowledge their forms, structure, characteristic features are considered. With the help of methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization, effectiveness dependence of the use of special economic knowledge and their relevance on the conditions of economic environment has been established. It was found that economic knowledge based on theoretical principles of economic sciences should be of a practical, applied nature, which makes appropriate requirements for organization of the educational procedure while professional training of persons entitled to conduct forensic economic examinations. In turn, the level of personal competence of a forensic economist depends on his practical skills and abilities and improves as more complex expert researches is carried out. It has been established that it is impossible for forensic economists to study issues that go beyond specific expertise scope and have a legal nature (establishing the circle of culpability of persons, interpreting norms of law, legal assessment of the actions of persons, including the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships between targeted actions and the resulting negative consequences) which deprives the forensic examination of the status of objective economic research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于司法经济学家的专业知识
司法经济学家实践活动的有效性程度在一定程度上取决于具体专业知识的理论有效性和法律对其的明确规制。本文旨在探讨专业经济知识的本质,确定司法经济学家的能力边界。在概括科学内容的同时,考虑反映专业经济知识本质的主要系统要素的形式、结构、特征。通过分析、综合、概括的方法,确立了经济专业知识运用的有效性、依赖性和对经济环境条件的关联性。委员会认为,以经济科学的理论原则为基础的经济知识应具有实际和应用的性质,这对组织教育程序提出了适当的要求,同时对有权进行法医经济检查的人员进行专业培训。反过来,司法经济学家的个人能力水平取决于他的实践技能和能力,并随着更复杂的专家研究的开展而提高。已经确定,司法经济学家不可能研究超出特定专业范围的具有法律性质的问题(建立人的罪责圈,解释法律规范,对人的行为进行法律评估,包括建立目标行为与由此产生的负面后果之间的因果关系),这剥夺了司法检验对客观经济研究的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
100 Years of Experience in Forensic Science Support to Justice Possibilities of Diagnostic Research on Speech of People State of Alcohol Intoxication Problematic Aspects of Appointing and Conducting a Forensic Fire Investigation Legal regulation of innovation and investment activities in agrarian sector of Ukrainian economy Introduction Directions of Foreign Innovative Practice in Staffing of Forensic Science Institutions of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1