Conflicting conceptualizations of human resource accounting

A. Steen, D. Welch, D. Mccormack
{"title":"Conflicting conceptualizations of human resource accounting","authors":"A. Steen, D. Welch, D. Mccormack","doi":"10.1108/14013381111197234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the differing perceptions or conceptualizations that have contributed to prevailing views held by accountants on the measurement and reporting of human resources.Design/methodology/approach – The study provides an analysis of extant literature and presents a theoretical framework on the relationship between HR, intellectual capital and goodwill.Findings – The lack of traction in the progress of accounting for people is due to several factors including tension between employees and management, the demands of internal and external stakeholders, and the historic roots of accounting for labour.Research limitations/implications – The paper provides suggestions as to how the debate regarding the valuing and reporting of human resources may be rekindled.Originality/value – This study highlights the historical context for the lack of traction in the area of accounting for people, and the relatively recent development of the Intellectual Capital Statement as a part...","PeriodicalId":119134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013381111197234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the differing perceptions or conceptualizations that have contributed to prevailing views held by accountants on the measurement and reporting of human resources.Design/methodology/approach – The study provides an analysis of extant literature and presents a theoretical framework on the relationship between HR, intellectual capital and goodwill.Findings – The lack of traction in the progress of accounting for people is due to several factors including tension between employees and management, the demands of internal and external stakeholders, and the historic roots of accounting for labour.Research limitations/implications – The paper provides suggestions as to how the debate regarding the valuing and reporting of human resources may be rekindled.Originality/value – This study highlights the historical context for the lack of traction in the area of accounting for people, and the relatively recent development of the Intellectual Capital Statement as a part...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人力资源会计概念冲突
目的-本文的目的是检查不同的看法或概念,这些看法或概念促成了会计师对人力资源的计量和报告持有的普遍观点。设计/方法论/方法——该研究对现有文献进行了分析,并提出了人力资源、智力资本和商誉之间关系的理论框架。调查结果-人力会计进展缺乏牵引力是由于几个因素造成的,包括员工和管理层之间的紧张关系,内部和外部利益相关者的需求,以及劳动力会计的历史根源。研究限制/影响-本文就如何重新点燃关于人力资源的价值和报告的辩论提供了建议。原创性/价值-本研究强调了人力会计领域缺乏牵引力的历史背景,以及相对较新的智力资本表的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of human resources in business model performance: The case of network-based companies A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from The Netherlands The analysis of intellectual capital evolution: a perspective on research Management control of work‐life balance. A narrative study of an Australian financial institution Bullying in context: a risk management perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1