High-definition Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Review and Meta-analysis for Neoplasia Detection in Barrett's Esophagus

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2022.06.001
Steven DeMeester , Kenneth Wang , Kamran Ayub , F. Paul Buckley , Philip Leggett , Paul Severson , Anastasia Chahine , Jason B. Samarasena
{"title":"High-definition Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Review and Meta-analysis for Neoplasia Detection in Barrett's Esophagus","authors":"Steven DeMeester ,&nbsp;Kenneth Wang ,&nbsp;Kamran Ayub ,&nbsp;F. Paul Buckley ,&nbsp;Philip Leggett ,&nbsp;Paul Severson ,&nbsp;Anastasia Chahine ,&nbsp;Jason B. Samarasena","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2022.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>The goal of this systematic review<span><span><span> and meta-analysis was to assess the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) benefit as an adjunct to random four-quadrant biopsies in the surveillance of patients with </span>Barrett's esophagus for </span>dysplasia and early esophageal cancer (EAC) detection.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies reporting pCLE detection rates and diagnostic accuracy for esophageal dysplasia and EAC. Three meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled sensitivities (SEs), specificities (SPs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and per-patient pooled absolute and relative detection rate of neoplasia with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare pCLE detection rate with that of random four-quadrant biopsies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9 studies were included (688 patients and 1299 lesions). Per-patient pCLE pooled SEs, SPs, and NPVs were 96% (95% CI 65%-100%), 93% (95% CI 71%-99%), and 98% (95% CI 93%-100%), respectively. Per-lesion pCLE pooled SEs, SPs, and NPVs were 82% (95% CI 63%-92%), 90% (95% CI 84%-94%), and 95% (95% CI 94%-97%), respectively. Compared with random biopsies, the per-patient pooled absolute and relative detection rate increases of neoplasia with pCLE were significant and equal to 5% (95% CI 1%-9%) and 243% (95% CI 122%-482%), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The addition of pCLE-guided biopsies provides a significantly higher diagnostic yield for dysplasia and cancer and reduces sampling error compared with random four-quadrant biopsies alone. Therefore, pCLE should be considered an important adjunct to Seattle protocol biopsies in patients undergoing screening or surveillance for Barrett's esophagus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) benefit as an adjunct to random four-quadrant biopsies in the surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus for dysplasia and early esophageal cancer (EAC) detection.

Methods

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies reporting pCLE detection rates and diagnostic accuracy for esophageal dysplasia and EAC. Three meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled sensitivities (SEs), specificities (SPs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and per-patient pooled absolute and relative detection rate of neoplasia with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare pCLE detection rate with that of random four-quadrant biopsies.

Results

A total of 9 studies were included (688 patients and 1299 lesions). Per-patient pCLE pooled SEs, SPs, and NPVs were 96% (95% CI 65%-100%), 93% (95% CI 71%-99%), and 98% (95% CI 93%-100%), respectively. Per-lesion pCLE pooled SEs, SPs, and NPVs were 82% (95% CI 63%-92%), 90% (95% CI 84%-94%), and 95% (95% CI 94%-97%), respectively. Compared with random biopsies, the per-patient pooled absolute and relative detection rate increases of neoplasia with pCLE were significant and equal to 5% (95% CI 1%-9%) and 243% (95% CI 122%-482%), respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of pCLE-guided biopsies provides a significantly higher diagnostic yield for dysplasia and cancer and reduces sampling error compared with random four-quadrant biopsies alone. Therefore, pCLE should be considered an important adjunct to Seattle protocol biopsies in patients undergoing screening or surveillance for Barrett's esophagus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于探针的高清晰度共聚焦激光内镜对Barrett食管肿瘤检测的回顾和荟萃分析
背景和目的本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估基于探针的共聚焦激光内镜(pCLE)作为随机四象限活检的辅助手段在监测Barrett食管异常增生和早期食管癌(EAC)检测中的益处。方法系统检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中有关pCLE对食管发育不良和EAC的检出率和诊断准确性的研究。进行了三项荟萃分析,以95%置信区间(ci)估计合并敏感性(SEs)、特异性(SPs)、阴性预测值(npv)和每位患者合并绝对和相对肿瘤检出率,并将pCLE检出率与随机四象限活检的检出率进行比较。结果共纳入9项研究(688例患者,1299个病灶)。每名患者pCLE汇总se、SPs和npv分别为96% (95% CI 65%-100%)、93% (95% CI 71%-99%)和98% (95% CI 93%-100%)。每个病灶的pCLE合并se、SPs和npv分别为82% (95% CI 63%-92%)、90% (95% CI 84%-94%)和95% (95% CI 94%-97%)。与随机活检相比,每名患者合并pCLE肿瘤的绝对检出率和相对检出率均显著增加,分别为5% (95% CI 1%-9%)和243% (95% CI 122%-482%)。结论与单独的随机四象限活检相比,pcle引导下的活检对异常增生和癌症的诊断率明显提高,并减少了抽样误差。因此,在接受巴雷特食管筛查或监测的患者中,pCLE应被视为西雅图方案活检的重要辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1