Can We Trust Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy Classification Using Machine Learning

Methus Narksenee, K. Sripanidkulchai
{"title":"Can We Trust Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy Classification Using Machine Learning","authors":"Methus Narksenee, K. Sripanidkulchai","doi":"10.1109/IRCE.2019.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile applications frequently request privacy information from users to supposedly use to improve online service and applications. The collected data, such as personally identifiable information, raises users’ concerns since some applications actually have malicious intentions to leak personal data. Privacy policies are an important resource as they are the sole source of information users can easily gain access in order to determine how applications plan to collect and use their data prior to downloading and using the application. However, users tend to ignore or gloss over privacy policies as they are often written in the complicated hard-to-understand language. Thus, users often miss crucial privacy-related information after reading such documents. In this paper, we experimentally determine how much we can trust an application’s privacy policy by looking at the language used in more than 9,000 privacy policies and compare them to what the applications actually do. We attempt to classify whether or not applications transmit privacy-related information using machine learning with three classifiers, support vector machines (SVMs), k- nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR). The best results show the average recall and precision of 0.81 and 0.31, respectively. High recall indicates that we are able to correctly identify most of the applications that transmit personally identifiable information. But, low precision indicates that we often over-identify applications as ones that transmit personally identifiable information when in reality they do not.","PeriodicalId":298781,"journal":{"name":"2019 2nd International Conference of Intelligent Robotic and Control Engineering (IRCE)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 2nd International Conference of Intelligent Robotic and Control Engineering (IRCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRCE.2019.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile applications frequently request privacy information from users to supposedly use to improve online service and applications. The collected data, such as personally identifiable information, raises users’ concerns since some applications actually have malicious intentions to leak personal data. Privacy policies are an important resource as they are the sole source of information users can easily gain access in order to determine how applications plan to collect and use their data prior to downloading and using the application. However, users tend to ignore or gloss over privacy policies as they are often written in the complicated hard-to-understand language. Thus, users often miss crucial privacy-related information after reading such documents. In this paper, we experimentally determine how much we can trust an application’s privacy policy by looking at the language used in more than 9,000 privacy policies and compare them to what the applications actually do. We attempt to classify whether or not applications transmit privacy-related information using machine learning with three classifiers, support vector machines (SVMs), k- nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR). The best results show the average recall and precision of 0.81 and 0.31, respectively. High recall indicates that we are able to correctly identify most of the applications that transmit personally identifiable information. But, low precision indicates that we often over-identify applications as ones that transmit personally identifiable information when in reality they do not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们可以信任隐私政策吗:使用机器学习的隐私政策分类
移动应用程序经常要求用户提供隐私信息,以改进在线服务和应用程序。这些收集到的数据,如个人身份信息,引起了用户的担忧,因为一些应用程序实际上有恶意泄露个人数据的意图。隐私政策是一项重要的资源,因为它们是用户可以轻松访问的唯一信息来源,以便在下载和使用应用程序之前确定应用程序计划如何收集和使用他们的数据。然而,用户往往忽略或掩盖隐私政策,因为它们通常是用复杂的难以理解的语言编写的。因此,用户在阅读这些文档后往往会错过与隐私相关的关键信息。在本文中,我们通过实验来确定我们可以在多大程度上信任应用程序的隐私策略,方法是查看9000多个隐私策略中使用的语言,并将它们与应用程序的实际操作进行比较。我们尝试使用机器学习与三种分类器,支持向量机(svm), k近邻(KNN),逻辑回归(LR),对应用程序是否传输隐私相关信息进行分类。最佳结果显示,平均查全率和查准率分别为0.81和0.31。高召回率表明我们能够正确识别大多数传输个人身份信息的应用程序。但是,低精度表明我们经常将应用程序过度识别为传输个人身份信息的应用程序,而实际上它们并没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IRCE 2019 Committees Digital Image Processing and Recognition in Industrial and Public Environments Object Detection with Task Description Only A Scan Matching Method For Quadruped Robots In Outdoor Environment Intergrated Production System using ERP and MES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1