Assessment of accuracy and performance of terrestrial laser scanner in monitoring of retaining walls

P. Psimoulis, Ali Algadhi, Athina Grizi, L. Neves
{"title":"Assessment of accuracy and performance of terrestrial laser scanner in monitoring of retaining walls","authors":"P. Psimoulis, Ali Algadhi, Athina Grizi, L. Neves","doi":"10.4995/jisdm2022.2022.13917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retaining walls are a critical infrastructure of transportation networks and the monitoring of their condition is crucial for the efficient and reliable maintenance of the network. The condition of retaining walls is frequently assessed using qualitative criteria and visual inspection, which are susceptible to human-bias and errors. To improve the management of these structures, reducing the probability of failure and the maintenance costs, it is critical to develop more efficient, reliable and quantitative monitoring approaches for these structures. The current study aims to evaluate the performance of Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) in deformation monitoring of retaining walls, based on the analysis of single scans (without registering the point clouds to build 3D models). The evaluation was based on a controlled experiment, where a wooden frame (1.5m x 1m) was used to simulate deformation scenarios for retaining walls, with an amplitude between 2 to 16 mm. A Leica RTC360 scanner was used to scan the wooden frame from distances varying between 10 to 27 m and angles varying between 0° to 20°. Five methods were applied to analyse the laser-scanner data and estimate the displacement: a target-based approach and four cloud-based approaches including the Cloud-to-Cloud (C2C), the Cloud-to-Mesh (C2M), the Multiscale-Model-to-Model-Cloud-Comparison (M3C2), and an alternative cloud-based method where the mean average of the point-cloud was used to estimate the displacement in the axis of the deformation. A Robotic Total Station Leica TS30 was also used to measure the deformation of the wooden frame and provide the ground truth values of the introduced deformation for each scenario. The results showed that the RTC360 had an accuracy of 1.3 mm with a confidence level of 95%.","PeriodicalId":404487,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring - JISDM 2022","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring - JISDM 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/jisdm2022.2022.13917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retaining walls are a critical infrastructure of transportation networks and the monitoring of their condition is crucial for the efficient and reliable maintenance of the network. The condition of retaining walls is frequently assessed using qualitative criteria and visual inspection, which are susceptible to human-bias and errors. To improve the management of these structures, reducing the probability of failure and the maintenance costs, it is critical to develop more efficient, reliable and quantitative monitoring approaches for these structures. The current study aims to evaluate the performance of Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) in deformation monitoring of retaining walls, based on the analysis of single scans (without registering the point clouds to build 3D models). The evaluation was based on a controlled experiment, where a wooden frame (1.5m x 1m) was used to simulate deformation scenarios for retaining walls, with an amplitude between 2 to 16 mm. A Leica RTC360 scanner was used to scan the wooden frame from distances varying between 10 to 27 m and angles varying between 0° to 20°. Five methods were applied to analyse the laser-scanner data and estimate the displacement: a target-based approach and four cloud-based approaches including the Cloud-to-Cloud (C2C), the Cloud-to-Mesh (C2M), the Multiscale-Model-to-Model-Cloud-Comparison (M3C2), and an alternative cloud-based method where the mean average of the point-cloud was used to estimate the displacement in the axis of the deformation. A Robotic Total Station Leica TS30 was also used to measure the deformation of the wooden frame and provide the ground truth values of the introduced deformation for each scenario. The results showed that the RTC360 had an accuracy of 1.3 mm with a confidence level of 95%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地面激光扫描仪在挡土墙监测中的精度和性能评价
挡土墙是交通网络的重要基础设施,其状态监测对交通网络的高效可靠维护至关重要。挡土墙的状况经常使用定性标准和目视检查来评估,这容易受到人为偏见和错误的影响。为了提高对这些结构的管理,降低其故障概率和维修成本,开发更有效、可靠和定量的监测方法至关重要。目前的研究旨在评估地面激光扫描仪(TLS)在挡土墙变形监测中的性能,基于单次扫描分析(不注册点云来建立3D模型)。评估基于对照实验,其中使用木制框架(1.5m x 1m)模拟挡土墙的变形场景,幅度在2至16 mm之间。使用徕卡RTC360扫描仪对木框架进行扫描,扫描距离为10 ~ 27米,角度为0°~ 20°。采用了五种方法来分析激光扫描仪数据并估计位移:基于目标的方法和四种基于云的方法,包括云到云(C2C)、云到网格(C2M)、多尺度模型到模型-云比较(M3C2),以及一种基于云的替代方法,该方法使用点云的平均值来估计变形轴上的位移。还使用徕卡机器人全站仪TS30测量木框架的变形,并提供每种情况下引入变形的地面真值。结果表明,RTC360的测量精度为1.3 mm,置信水平为95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Landslide monitoring using geotechnical, UAV, GNSS and MTInSAR instrumentation Evaluation of synthetic aperture radar interferometric techniques for monitoring of fast deformation caused by underground mining exploitation Long and close-range terrestrial photogrammetry for rocky landscape deformation monitoring PS-InSAR and UAV technology used in the stability study of Ankang expansive soil airport Deformation analysis in landslides NE Bulgaria using GNSS data complemented by InSAR for better interpretation results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1