The Ethical Implications of the Overuse of Technology in Education

M. Ben-Jacob, A. Glazerman
{"title":"The Ethical Implications of the Overuse of Technology in Education","authors":"M. Ben-Jacob, A. Glazerman","doi":"10.1177/00472395211013049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overuse of technology permeates education. Underlying its appropriate use is the factor of trust. Trust is essential for ethical behavior in education. Anything that undermines that trust is arguably inimical to those endeavors. To be sure, technology is now embedded in every facet of our lives, and its many advances have proven beneficial; for example, technology has enabled remote instruction, work from home, and telemedicine, all beneficial to its users, particularly in these difficult times of a pandemic. That said, we would like to call attention to the overuse of technology in some instances, its undermining of trust, and the consequent adverse and unethical impact on education. Two kinds of trust need to be distinguished. The first, what we might call reliabilitybased trust, is “the reliance on the integrity, strength, truth, ability, surety, etc. of a person or thing” (Dictionary.com, 2020). We thus say, for example, “The teacher trusted that John would erase the white board every day last week as that was his assigned job”; or “I trust the New York Times to report the true and unadulterated news of the day because it is a newspaper that has integrity.” The second kind of trust is what Patrick Lencioni, in another context, refers to as vulnerability-based trust, and is what allows","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211013049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overuse of technology permeates education. Underlying its appropriate use is the factor of trust. Trust is essential for ethical behavior in education. Anything that undermines that trust is arguably inimical to those endeavors. To be sure, technology is now embedded in every facet of our lives, and its many advances have proven beneficial; for example, technology has enabled remote instruction, work from home, and telemedicine, all beneficial to its users, particularly in these difficult times of a pandemic. That said, we would like to call attention to the overuse of technology in some instances, its undermining of trust, and the consequent adverse and unethical impact on education. Two kinds of trust need to be distinguished. The first, what we might call reliabilitybased trust, is “the reliance on the integrity, strength, truth, ability, surety, etc. of a person or thing” (Dictionary.com, 2020). We thus say, for example, “The teacher trusted that John would erase the white board every day last week as that was his assigned job”; or “I trust the New York Times to report the true and unadulterated news of the day because it is a newspaper that has integrity.” The second kind of trust is what Patrick Lencioni, in another context, refers to as vulnerability-based trust, and is what allows
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在教育中过度使用技术的伦理含义
过度使用技术渗透到教育中。其合理使用的基础是信任因素。信任是教育伦理行为的必要条件。可以说,任何破坏这种信任的事情都不利于这些努力。可以肯定的是,技术现在已经融入了我们生活的方方面面,它的许多进步已经被证明是有益的;例如,技术使远程教学、在家工作和远程医疗成为可能,所有这些都有利于其用户,特别是在大流行的困难时期。话虽如此,我们还是想提醒大家注意在某些情况下过度使用技术,它破坏了信任,以及由此对教育产生的不利和不道德的影响。两种信任需要区分。第一种,我们可以称之为基于可靠性的信任,是“对一个人或一件事的正直、力量、真相、能力、保证等的依赖”(Dictionary.com, 2020)。例如,我们会说:“老师相信约翰上周每天都会擦白板,因为这是他的任务。”或者“我相信《纽约时报》会报道每日真实、无掺杂的新闻,因为它是一家诚信的报纸。”第二种信任是Patrick Lencioni在另一种语境中所说的基于漏洞的信任,它允许
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX Design for Deaf Children: How is it Done Now? Should it Change? Innovative Debriefing Approach: Applying a Project Management Framework to Develop a Debriefing Communications Plan for Educational Computer-Based Simulation Games Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the Physical–Hybrid–Virtual Continuum Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education Centering the Learner Within Instructional Design: The Evolution of Learning Design and the Emergence of Learning Experience Design (LXD) in Workforce Training and Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1