A Comparison of Solid and Loaded Bowtie Antennas in GPR for the Detection of Buried Landmines

W. van Verre, F. Podd, Yee M. Tan, Xianyang Gao, A. Peyton
{"title":"A Comparison of Solid and Loaded Bowtie Antennas in GPR for the Detection of Buried Landmines","authors":"W. van Verre, F. Podd, Yee M. Tan, Xianyang Gao, A. Peyton","doi":"10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison between solid and resisitively loaded bowtie antennas in GPR applications for the purpose of finding buried landmines. The resistively-loaded antennas were first evaluated over dry sand in a laboratory-based experiment with a landmine surrogate. Further testing, comparing the performance of the loaded antennas to that of solid bowtie antennas, was performed over real soil, with a real landmine. Using the loaded bowtie antennas, the system got a response from the target in the indoor experiment but not in the outdoor experiment. The system did detect the buried landmine in the outdoor experiment when using the solid bowtie antennas. It is likely that the losses in the real soil were too high compared to the losses in dry sand for the system to be able to get a response using loaded antennas. The GPR system tested in this paper forms part of a dual-modality system for humanitarian demining applications.","PeriodicalId":269482,"journal":{"name":"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between solid and resisitively loaded bowtie antennas in GPR applications for the purpose of finding buried landmines. The resistively-loaded antennas were first evaluated over dry sand in a laboratory-based experiment with a landmine surrogate. Further testing, comparing the performance of the loaded antennas to that of solid bowtie antennas, was performed over real soil, with a real landmine. Using the loaded bowtie antennas, the system got a response from the target in the indoor experiment but not in the outdoor experiment. The system did detect the buried landmine in the outdoor experiment when using the solid bowtie antennas. It is likely that the losses in the real soil were too high compared to the losses in dry sand for the system to be able to get a response using loaded antennas. The GPR system tested in this paper forms part of a dual-modality system for humanitarian demining applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探地雷达中实心与负载弓形天线探测地雷的比较
本文介绍了在探地雷达探测地雷的应用中固体和电阻加载弓形结天线的比较。电阻负载天线首先在实验室的地雷替代品实验中在干沙上进行了评估。进一步的测试,将负载天线的性能与实心领结天线的性能进行比较,在真实的土壤和真实的地雷上进行。利用加载的领结天线,系统在室内实验中得到了目标的响应,而在室外实验中没有得到目标的响应。在室外实验中,系统采用实心领结天线对埋地地雷进行了探测。与干沙中的损耗相比,真实土壤中的损耗可能太高,因此系统无法使用加载的天线获得响应。本文所测试的探地雷达系统是人道主义排雷应用的双重模式系统的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A high-stability dual-chip GPR for cooperative target probing Ice volume estimates of Swiss glaciers using helicopter-borne GPR — an example from the Glacier de la Plaine Morte Detection of Top Coal by Conductively-Guided Borehole Radar Waves: Results from Numerical Modelling Investigating karst cave sediments of unroofed caves with GPR, XRF and XRD Comparison of GPR and Capacitance Probe laboratory experiments in sandy soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1