Measuring the Sciences Contribution to Socioeconomic Development: Russian Approaches in the Global Space of Ideas

A. Yanik
{"title":"Measuring the Sciences Contribution to Socioeconomic Development: Russian Approaches in the Global Space of Ideas","authors":"A. Yanik","doi":"10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.222-253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: this review aims to present the ‘state-of-the-art’ on the theory and practice of measuring the contribution of sciences to socioeconomic progress and trace the Russian approaches in the global space of ideas.Methods: for studying a multidisciplinary sample of academic publications and gray literature includes multifactor systematization, critical analysis, and synthetic generalization in a large context («helicopter view»).Results: a brief history of the subject is presented in the context of the state's use of science for socio-economic development. The review outlines the focus areas of scientific thought, the conceptual frameworks state, current approaches to measuring the contribution of sciences, the limitations and risks of the evaluation practice.Conclusions and Relevance: key areas of scientific thought in the subject under review for 100 years: (1) development of econometric approaches for measuring the «profitability» of science; (2) attempts to identify and measure the societal impacts of science; (3) scientific support of government experiments to use the evaluation technologies for increasing the return of budget investment to science; (4) conceptualizing and universalizing the terms. There are no indisputable solutions in any of these areas. Disappointment with the catch-all indicators and universal metrics encourages the development of case-oriented methods and process-oriented approaches.Russian research covers the full range of issues, but their world recognition (except some achievements of Soviet time) is low. The lack of institutional memory leads to the rediscovery of the ideas of the 20th century. Establishing the equivalence of terms and conceptual approaches used by scientists from different countries and periods will help to effectively use the scientific heritage, avoid duplicate research, provide a fair place to the Russian achievements in world science. ","PeriodicalId":373043,"journal":{"name":"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.222-253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: this review aims to present the ‘state-of-the-art’ on the theory and practice of measuring the contribution of sciences to socioeconomic progress and trace the Russian approaches in the global space of ideas.Methods: for studying a multidisciplinary sample of academic publications and gray literature includes multifactor systematization, critical analysis, and synthetic generalization in a large context («helicopter view»).Results: a brief history of the subject is presented in the context of the state's use of science for socio-economic development. The review outlines the focus areas of scientific thought, the conceptual frameworks state, current approaches to measuring the contribution of sciences, the limitations and risks of the evaluation practice.Conclusions and Relevance: key areas of scientific thought in the subject under review for 100 years: (1) development of econometric approaches for measuring the «profitability» of science; (2) attempts to identify and measure the societal impacts of science; (3) scientific support of government experiments to use the evaluation technologies for increasing the return of budget investment to science; (4) conceptualizing and universalizing the terms. There are no indisputable solutions in any of these areas. Disappointment with the catch-all indicators and universal metrics encourages the development of case-oriented methods and process-oriented approaches.Russian research covers the full range of issues, but their world recognition (except some achievements of Soviet time) is low. The lack of institutional memory leads to the rediscovery of the ideas of the 20th century. Establishing the equivalence of terms and conceptual approaches used by scientists from different countries and periods will help to effectively use the scientific heritage, avoid duplicate research, provide a fair place to the Russian achievements in world science. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量科学对社会经济发展的贡献:全球思想空间中的俄罗斯方法
目的:本综述旨在介绍衡量科学对社会经济进步贡献的理论和实践的“最新技术”,并追溯俄罗斯在全球思想空间中的方法。研究学术出版物和灰色文献的多学科样本的方法包括多因素系统化、批判性分析和大背景下的综合概括(“直升机视角”)。结果:在国家利用科学促进社会经济发展的背景下,介绍了该主题的简史。该综述概述了科学思想的重点领域、概念框架状态、目前衡量科学贡献的方法、评估实践的局限性和风险。结论和相关性:100年来回顾的主题中科学思想的关键领域:(1)衡量科学“盈利能力”的计量经济学方法的发展;(2)试图识别和衡量科学的社会影响;(3)科学支持政府实验,利用评价技术提高预算内科学投资回报;(4)对术语进行概念化和普遍化。在这些领域都没有无可争议的解决办法。对包罗万象的指标和普遍标准的失望鼓励了面向案例的方法和面向过程的方法的发展。俄罗斯的研究涵盖了所有问题,但他们的世界认可度(除了苏联时期的一些成就)很低。制度性记忆的缺失导致了对20世纪思想的重新发现。建立不同国家和不同时期科学家使用的术语和概念方法的对等关系,有助于有效利用科学遗产,避免重复研究,为俄罗斯在世界科学领域的成就提供公平的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Landscape of scientific research on the problems of decarbonization and achieving carbon neutrality of national economies Transport infrastructure in ensuring regional development and China's global competitiveness Comparison of municipalities within whose borders specially protected natural areas are located The impact of the digital technological revolution on the development of crisis management theory Formation of methodological foundations for the analysis of national development in conditions of foreign economic discrimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1