Does the Short Squeeze Lead to Market Abnormality and Anti-leverage Effect? Evidence From the GameStop Case

Evangelos Vasileiou
{"title":"Does the Short Squeeze Lead to Market Abnormality and Anti-leverage Effect? Evidence From the GameStop Case","authors":"Evangelos Vasileiou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3831619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the GME short squeeze in early 2021. Using intraday data from the period 4/1/2021 - 5/2/2021, we show that the GME stock price exhibited abnormal behavior. The Runs-test confirms that the GME returns were not randomly distributed, which is an indication of a violation of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Moreover, we employ the asymmetry EGARCH(1,1,1) model and we provide evidence that an exceptional time series feature emerged during the examined period: the anti-leverage effect. In contrast to what the time series normally show, volatility increased when the GME prices increase. The combination of the short squeeze and the investors’ coordination may be the appropriate conditions for the anti-leverage effect to emerge, which may be a new way to econometrically show violation of the EMH. The outcome of this analysis is useful for scholars and regulators because coordination among investors is easier than ever in the internet era and such events may happen again in the future; even under normal conditions (not during a short squeeze) this could lead to market instability.","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study examines the GME short squeeze in early 2021. Using intraday data from the period 4/1/2021 - 5/2/2021, we show that the GME stock price exhibited abnormal behavior. The Runs-test confirms that the GME returns were not randomly distributed, which is an indication of a violation of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Moreover, we employ the asymmetry EGARCH(1,1,1) model and we provide evidence that an exceptional time series feature emerged during the examined period: the anti-leverage effect. In contrast to what the time series normally show, volatility increased when the GME prices increase. The combination of the short squeeze and the investors’ coordination may be the appropriate conditions for the anti-leverage effect to emerge, which may be a new way to econometrically show violation of the EMH. The outcome of this analysis is useful for scholars and regulators because coordination among investors is easier than ever in the internet era and such events may happen again in the future; even under normal conditions (not during a short squeeze) this could lead to market instability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卖空挤压是否会导致市场异常及反杠杆效应?来自GameStop案例的证据
本研究考察了2021年初的GME短期挤压。利用2021年4月1日至2021年5月2日的盘中数据,我们发现GME股价表现出异常行为。运行检验证实了GME的收益不是随机分布的,这表明它违反了有效市场假说(EMH)。此外,我们采用不对称EGARCH(1,1,1)模型,并提供证据表明,在研究期间出现了一个特殊的时间序列特征:反杠杆效应。与时间序列通常显示的相反,当GME价格上涨时,波动性会增加。卖空挤压与投资者协调的结合可能是反杠杆效应出现的适当条件,这可能是计量显示EMH违规的一种新方法。这一分析的结果对学者和监管机构很有用,因为在互联网时代,投资者之间的协调比以往任何时候都更容易,而且此类事件未来可能再次发生;即使在正常情况下(不是在短期挤压期间),这也可能导致市场不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Option-Like Fund Performance Fees in Asset Management via Monte Carlo Actuarial Distortion Pricing Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits Deleveraging CAPM: Asset Betas vs. Equity Betas The Dynamics of Financial Policies and Group Decisions in Private Firms Money Talks: Information and Seignorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1