The Problems of Delimitation of Judicial Powers between the Courts of General Jurisdiction and Regional Constitutional (Charter) Judicial Authorities

{"title":"The Problems of Delimitation of Judicial Powers between the Courts of General Jurisdiction and Regional Constitutional (Charter) Judicial Authorities","authors":"","doi":"10.34076/2410-2709-2019-1-45-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issues of correlation of constitutional (charter) justice and administrative proceedings exercised by courts of general jurisdiction while implementing judicial control. Having interpreted the provisions of Federal Constitutional Law «On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation» and the Russian Code of Administrative Proceedings, the authors show the shortcomings inherent in the current legal regulation of the competence of the judiciary, its inaccuracy, which leads to possibility of different interpretations of the rules. The norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings may create so-called dual jurisdiction when the same case falls into the jurisdictions of a court of general jurisdiction and a regional constitutional (charter) court. To prevent such a situation, in those sub-federal entities where regional constitutional (charter) courts are created it is the responsibility of these courts to deal with cases contesting normative legal acts of regional and local levels. \nFor this purpose the authors substantiate the need to improve the regulation of the powers of courts of general jurisdiction in the field of administrative law control, taking into account related institutions of constitutional justice. In particular, they propose some amendments to the Law of the Sverdlovsk region «On the Charter Court of the Sverdlovsk region».","PeriodicalId":248707,"journal":{"name":"Rossijskoe Pravo. Obrazovanie, Praktika, Nauka","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossijskoe Pravo. Obrazovanie, Praktika, Nauka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2410-2709-2019-1-45-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of correlation of constitutional (charter) justice and administrative proceedings exercised by courts of general jurisdiction while implementing judicial control. Having interpreted the provisions of Federal Constitutional Law «On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation» and the Russian Code of Administrative Proceedings, the authors show the shortcomings inherent in the current legal regulation of the competence of the judiciary, its inaccuracy, which leads to possibility of different interpretations of the rules. The norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings may create so-called dual jurisdiction when the same case falls into the jurisdictions of a court of general jurisdiction and a regional constitutional (charter) court. To prevent such a situation, in those sub-federal entities where regional constitutional (charter) courts are created it is the responsibility of these courts to deal with cases contesting normative legal acts of regional and local levels. For this purpose the authors substantiate the need to improve the regulation of the powers of courts of general jurisdiction in the field of administrative law control, taking into account related institutions of constitutional justice. In particular, they propose some amendments to the Law of the Sverdlovsk region «On the Charter Court of the Sverdlovsk region».
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般管辖权法院与地方宪法(宪章)司法机关司法权划分问题
本文论述了在实施司法控制的同时,具有一般管辖权的法院行使的宪法(宪章)司法与行政诉讼的相互关系问题。通过对联邦宪法法律《关于俄罗斯联邦司法制度》和《俄罗斯行政诉讼法》条款的解释,作者指出了现行司法权限法律规定的内在缺陷和不准确性,这导致了对规则的不同解释的可能性。当同一案件属于具有一般管辖权的法院和区域宪法(宪章)法院的管辖权时,《行政诉讼法典》的规范可能造成所谓的双重管辖权。为了防止这种情况,在设立了区域宪法(宪章)法院的次联邦实体中,这些法院有责任处理对区域和地方一级的规范性法律行为提出异议的案件。为此目的,作者证实有必要在考虑到宪法司法的有关机构的情况下,改进对行政法控制领域一般管辖权法院权力的管制。特别是,他们提出了对斯维尔德洛夫斯克州法律“关于斯维尔德洛夫斯克州宪章法院”的一些修正案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Admission of a Notary to Entrepreneurs in Custody: Problems of Implementation Peculiarities of Realization and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms on the Internet: a Problem Statement Why Do Lawyers Need Legal Anthropology? On the Modern Problems of Representation Used in the Implementation of the Supervisory Function of the Prosecutor’s Of ce The Concept of Rumors, Their Collection and Use in Investigating Crimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1