{"title":"Problem „świadomości w ogóle” u Kanta i Jaspersa","authors":"Włodzimierz Heflik","doi":"10.24917/9788380846616.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his book on Kant, Jaspers equates consciousness-as-such with transcenden- tal apperception. Within the framework of Kantian philosophy, consciousness as transcendental apperception is treated as: (1) original synthetic unity, and (2) a form of consciousness or form of presentation. I first consider the con- nections between consciousness-as-such and the transcendental subject, the transcendental I and the noumenal I. I then turn to an analysis of Jaspers’ treatment of consciousness-as-such. He understands this term to mean “the encompassing that is the entity that I am (self)”. Consciousness-as-such is considered in two ways, i.e. through a description of (1) what it is in itself, and (2) its relationship with other kinds of encompassing. I limit my discussion to the relationship between consciousness and two main kinds of encompassing, that is Existenz and reason. I focus on the concept of consciousness from the following perspectives: (1) as a form, (2) the role of Existenz as a factor filling in the empty form of consciousness, and (3) as illuminating consciousness through reason.","PeriodicalId":313262,"journal":{"name":"Karl Jaspers. Filozofia wieczysta - filozofia czasu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karl Jaspers. Filozofia wieczysta - filozofia czasu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/9788380846616.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In his book on Kant, Jaspers equates consciousness-as-such with transcenden- tal apperception. Within the framework of Kantian philosophy, consciousness as transcendental apperception is treated as: (1) original synthetic unity, and (2) a form of consciousness or form of presentation. I first consider the con- nections between consciousness-as-such and the transcendental subject, the transcendental I and the noumenal I. I then turn to an analysis of Jaspers’ treatment of consciousness-as-such. He understands this term to mean “the encompassing that is the entity that I am (self)”. Consciousness-as-such is considered in two ways, i.e. through a description of (1) what it is in itself, and (2) its relationship with other kinds of encompassing. I limit my discussion to the relationship between consciousness and two main kinds of encompassing, that is Existenz and reason. I focus on the concept of consciousness from the following perspectives: (1) as a form, (2) the role of Existenz as a factor filling in the empty form of consciousness, and (3) as illuminating consciousness through reason.