Poetics of the Body: Thinking with Andrés Montoya

Stephanie Fetta
{"title":"Poetics of the Body: Thinking with Andrés Montoya","authors":"Stephanie Fetta","doi":"10.2979/chiricu.7.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2022 Trustees of Indiana University • doi:10.2979/chiricu.7.1.02 I am aware of my heartbeat, and my neck and jaw tense slightly as I consider the painting by Andrés Montoya, the poet impetus for this special issue of Chiricú. Known as the winner of the American Book Award, Montoya also painted various watercolors, while knowing he was dying of leukemia at age thirty-one. A roughly strewn lone skeleton, the variably black paint disrupts the solidity I expect to see to announce the a priori condition of death. The conundrum of presence/absence of personhood and death: this issue focuses on the growing awareness of the personhood of the material body—the soma—the flesh-being intertwined with the mind and, nevertheless, the primary entity of our being. The soma lies in support of our mental desires, aversions, and will, but also responds to our moment-bymoment lived experience before our personalities can. With this understanding of corporal subjectivity, the skeleton becomes an expression of the soma; it presents human remains as also a continuing being-ness. The skeleton reminds us we are flesh beings before we are psychologically conceived personalities, and in death, we return to flesh beings. The skeleton found in many of Montoya’s watercolors continues the trajectory of his poetry where the legacies of colonialisms and hemispheric spiritual and poetic traditions are discussed from the perspective of the soma, the cognitive flesh body. The somewhat to-scale proportions of the head, chest, spine, and limbs of the skeleton contrast with the hand bones. These should be described as the hand’s bones, which, like the skeleton’s feet, are less anatomically realistic. Their disproportions visually cue the microsubjectivity Montoya gives to body parts in his poetry. They are massive hands, emphasized even more than the feet, a prominence that speaks to the limitations of an individual’s capacity to modify their world or exert unbridled influence, their reliance on the will of others. The Cartesian mind uses the body for its will; it is probably not a coincidence that the hands and feet are the two primary biological tools to implement the mind’s will. In the final instance, in death, the mind reckons with its ultimate failure to act, its inability to continue its own life, the reality of social interdependence, human frailty, and temporality. Or is it that thus enlarged, they seek to invoke the wanting, poetics of the body Thinking with Andrés Montoya","PeriodicalId":240236,"journal":{"name":"Chiricú Journal: Latina/o Literatures, Arts, and Cultures","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiricú Journal: Latina/o Literatures, Arts, and Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/chiricu.7.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Copyright © 2022 Trustees of Indiana University • doi:10.2979/chiricu.7.1.02 I am aware of my heartbeat, and my neck and jaw tense slightly as I consider the painting by Andrés Montoya, the poet impetus for this special issue of Chiricú. Known as the winner of the American Book Award, Montoya also painted various watercolors, while knowing he was dying of leukemia at age thirty-one. A roughly strewn lone skeleton, the variably black paint disrupts the solidity I expect to see to announce the a priori condition of death. The conundrum of presence/absence of personhood and death: this issue focuses on the growing awareness of the personhood of the material body—the soma—the flesh-being intertwined with the mind and, nevertheless, the primary entity of our being. The soma lies in support of our mental desires, aversions, and will, but also responds to our moment-bymoment lived experience before our personalities can. With this understanding of corporal subjectivity, the skeleton becomes an expression of the soma; it presents human remains as also a continuing being-ness. The skeleton reminds us we are flesh beings before we are psychologically conceived personalities, and in death, we return to flesh beings. The skeleton found in many of Montoya’s watercolors continues the trajectory of his poetry where the legacies of colonialisms and hemispheric spiritual and poetic traditions are discussed from the perspective of the soma, the cognitive flesh body. The somewhat to-scale proportions of the head, chest, spine, and limbs of the skeleton contrast with the hand bones. These should be described as the hand’s bones, which, like the skeleton’s feet, are less anatomically realistic. Their disproportions visually cue the microsubjectivity Montoya gives to body parts in his poetry. They are massive hands, emphasized even more than the feet, a prominence that speaks to the limitations of an individual’s capacity to modify their world or exert unbridled influence, their reliance on the will of others. The Cartesian mind uses the body for its will; it is probably not a coincidence that the hands and feet are the two primary biological tools to implement the mind’s will. In the final instance, in death, the mind reckons with its ultimate failure to act, its inability to continue its own life, the reality of social interdependence, human frailty, and temporality. Or is it that thus enlarged, they seek to invoke the wanting, poetics of the body Thinking with Andrés Montoya
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体的诗学:与安德里亚·蒙托亚一起思考
版权所有©2022印第安纳大学校董会•doi:10.2979/chiricu.7.1.02我意识到我的心跳,我的脖子和下巴轻微紧张,当我想到安德里萨斯·蒙托亚的画,诗人推动这个Chiricú特刊。作为美国图书奖的得主,蒙托亚也画了各种水彩画,尽管他知道自己31岁时死于白血病。一具孤零零的骨架,粗糙地散落着,黑色的油漆破坏了我期望看到的坚固性,宣告了先验的死亡状态。人格的存在/缺失与死亡的难题:这个问题关注的是对物质身体——躯体——肉体——与精神交织在一起的人格的日益认识,尽管如此,肉体是我们存在的主要实体。躯体支持我们的心理欲望、厌恶和意志,但也在我们的人格之前对我们每时每刻的生活经历做出反应。有了这种对肉体主体性的理解,骨骼就成了躯体的一种表达;它将人类遗骸也呈现为一种持续的存在。骷髅提醒我们,在心理上形成人格之前,我们是有血有肉的人,死亡之后,我们又回到了有血有肉的人。在蒙托亚的许多水彩画中发现的骨架延续了他诗歌的轨迹,在那里殖民主义的遗产和半球精神和诗歌传统是从躯体的角度来讨论的,认知肉体。头骨、胸部、脊柱和四肢的比例与手骨形成了一定的对比。这些应该被描述为手的骨头,就像骨骼的脚一样,在解剖学上不太真实。它们的比例失调在视觉上暗示了蒙托亚在诗歌中赋予身体部位的微主体性。它们是一双粗大的手,甚至比脚还要突出,这种突出说明了个人改变世界或施加不受约束的影响的能力的局限性,以及他们对他人意愿的依赖。笛卡尔的思想利用肉体来实现意志;手和脚是实现心灵意志的两种主要生物工具,这可能不是巧合。在最后的例子中,在死亡中,心灵考虑到它最终的行动失败,它无法继续自己的生命,社会相互依存的现实,人类的脆弱性和短暂性。或者是被放大了,他们试图唤起欲望,身体的诗学与安德里亚·蒙托亚一起思考
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forehead The Poetry of Andrés Montoya: Mystic Homo Sacer Oración the earth dreams us dead end mouth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1