Factors Related to the Selection of Childbirth Assistance

Suchi Avnalurini Sharief, Kurnia La Ali
{"title":"Factors Related to the Selection of Childbirth Assistance","authors":"Suchi Avnalurini Sharief, Kurnia La Ali","doi":"10.33846/aijha10402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus on reducing MMR is carried out on activities that include three messages in the MPS program, namely that each delivery is assisted by trained health workers, each obstetric and neonatal complications receive adequate services and every woman of childbearing age has access to prevention of unwanted pregnancy and management of miscarriage complications. The higher the coverage of childbirth by health workers, the lower the risk of death, therefore the goal of health development, one of which is to significantly increase the number of pregnant women who get examined and give birth assisted by health workers. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of education, employment, family support, affordability of access to health facilities (transportation), socio-cultural relations with the selection of birth assistance in the work area of Lede Health Center. This type of research was an observational study with a cross-sectional approach. The subjects were all mothers with childbirth in the work area of Lede Health Center, Lede. Regency, North Maluku, from January to June 2018 as many as 61 people. The results of this study indicate that there was a relationship between education and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.000), there was a relationship between work and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.000), there was a relationship between family support and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.009), there was a relationship between access to health services and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.028), there was no relationship between social culture and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.246). So, the factors related to childbirth assistance were education, work, family support, access to health facilities. \nKeywords: childbirth assistance; education; work; family support; access to health facilities","PeriodicalId":342787,"journal":{"name":"Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33846/aijha10402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus on reducing MMR is carried out on activities that include three messages in the MPS program, namely that each delivery is assisted by trained health workers, each obstetric and neonatal complications receive adequate services and every woman of childbearing age has access to prevention of unwanted pregnancy and management of miscarriage complications. The higher the coverage of childbirth by health workers, the lower the risk of death, therefore the goal of health development, one of which is to significantly increase the number of pregnant women who get examined and give birth assisted by health workers. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of education, employment, family support, affordability of access to health facilities (transportation), socio-cultural relations with the selection of birth assistance in the work area of Lede Health Center. This type of research was an observational study with a cross-sectional approach. The subjects were all mothers with childbirth in the work area of Lede Health Center, Lede. Regency, North Maluku, from January to June 2018 as many as 61 people. The results of this study indicate that there was a relationship between education and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.000), there was a relationship between work and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.000), there was a relationship between family support and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.009), there was a relationship between access to health services and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.028), there was no relationship between social culture and the selection of childbirth assistance (p-value = 0.246). So, the factors related to childbirth assistance were education, work, family support, access to health facilities. Keywords: childbirth assistance; education; work; family support; access to health facilities
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择助产方式的相关因素
减少产妇死亡率的重点活动包括公共卫生方案中的三个信息,即每次分娩都由训练有素的保健工作者协助,每种产科和新生儿并发症都得到充分的服务,每个育龄妇女都可以获得预防意外怀孕和管理流产并发症的机会。卫生工作者对分娩的覆盖率越高,死亡风险就越低,因此,卫生发展的目标之一是大幅增加接受卫生工作者检查和协助分娩的孕妇人数。本研究的目的是确定教育、就业、家庭支持、获得保健设施的可负担性(交通)、社会文化关系与Lede保健中心工作区域生育援助的选择之间的关系。这种类型的研究是一种采用横断面方法的观察性研究。研究对象均为莱德市莱德健康中心工作区域内分娩的母亲。北马鲁古摄政,2018年1月至6月多达61人。本研究结果表明,受教育程度与助产选择之间存在关系(p值= 0.000),工作与助产选择之间存在关系(p值= 0.000),家庭支持与助产选择之间存在关系(p值= 0.009),获得卫生服务与助产选择之间存在关系(p值= 0.028)。社会文化与助产方式的选择没有关系(p值= 0.246)。因此,与分娩援助相关的因素是教育,工作,家庭支持,获得医疗设施。关键词:助产;教育;工作;家人的支持;利用保健设施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Nurse in the Form of Palliative Care on the Quality of Life of Patients with Cervical Cancer The development of Nursing Curiculum in Thailand Bullying Behavior and Social Interaction Ability of School-age Children in Tambangan Public Elementary School 02 Mijen Semarang Effectiveness of Early Exercise Against Uterine Involution in Spontaneous Postpartum Patients The Effect of Tai Chi Gymnastic on Decreasing Low Back Pain of Elderly Farmers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1