Odzyskany głos w dyskusji nad romantyzmem polskim. Rec.: Wołodymyr Hnatiuk, Ukrajinśko-polśka prawobereżna romantyczna literatura. Wybrani praci. Hołownyj redaktor i uporiadnyk Rostysław Radyszewśkyj. Kyjiw 2009
{"title":"Odzyskany głos w dyskusji nad romantyzmem polskim. Rec.: Wołodymyr Hnatiuk, Ukrajinśko-polśka prawobereżna romantyczna literatura. Wybrani praci. Hołownyj redaktor i uporiadnyk Rostysław Radyszewśkyj. Kyjiw 2009","authors":"M. Bracka","doi":"10.18318/pl.2019.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tion of Samuel Zborowski suggested by Troszyński—in many points different from the text known from the erstwhile editions—and the most fundamental values of this publication against the background of the presently observed “return to the sources” of romantic literature, especially interest in drafts, as well as in the context of the developmental tendencies of contemporary editing. She also attempts to evaluate the adopted editorial solutions, ingenious and brave, from the stance of a mixed competence receiver. Abstract RegAined The review discusses a volume of selected papers by a Ukrainian Volodymyr Hnatiuk, polish literature scholar and comparatist of the inter-war years. As based on archive sources and analyses of texts by Romantic Ukrainophiles, the researcher formulates his own conception of “Ukrainian school” literary heritage in the polish Romanticism seen as a Romantic polish-Ukrainian literature. He investigates the development and fall of the 19 th c. Ukrainophile movement, marking certain analogies with the proven-çal movement. The","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pamiętnik Literacki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2019.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
tion of Samuel Zborowski suggested by Troszyński—in many points different from the text known from the erstwhile editions—and the most fundamental values of this publication against the background of the presently observed “return to the sources” of romantic literature, especially interest in drafts, as well as in the context of the developmental tendencies of contemporary editing. She also attempts to evaluate the adopted editorial solutions, ingenious and brave, from the stance of a mixed competence receiver. Abstract RegAined The review discusses a volume of selected papers by a Ukrainian Volodymyr Hnatiuk, polish literature scholar and comparatist of the inter-war years. As based on archive sources and analyses of texts by Romantic Ukrainophiles, the researcher formulates his own conception of “Ukrainian school” literary heritage in the polish Romanticism seen as a Romantic polish-Ukrainian literature. He investigates the development and fall of the 19 th c. Ukrainophile movement, marking certain analogies with the proven-çal movement. The
Samuel Zborowski的tion在Troszyński-in上提出了许多不同于以前版本的文本的观点,并且在当前观察到的浪漫主义文学“回归来源”的背景下,特别是对草稿的兴趣,以及在当代编辑发展趋势的背景下,该出版物的最基本价值。她还试图从一个混合能力接受者的立场来评估所采用的编辑解决方案,既巧妙又勇敢。本文讨论了一卷由乌克兰的波兰文学学者和两次世界大战期间的比较学家Volodymyr Hnatiuk所选的论文。基于档案资料和对浪漫乌克兰派文本的分析,研究者在波兰浪漫主义文学遗产中形成了自己的“乌克兰学派”文学遗产概念,被视为浪漫的波兰-乌克兰文学。他调查了19世纪亲乌克兰运动的发展和衰落,并将其与经过证实的亲乌克兰运动进行了某些类比。的