{"title":"International Commerce through a Foreign Subsidiary: Navigating the Anti-Haven Tax Shoals of the Internal Revenue Code","authors":"Ernest R. Larkins","doi":"10.15779/Z385W63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, one of the advantages of doing business abroad through a foreign subsidiary has been the possibility of using tax havens to minimize foreign income taxes and, at the same time, defer the offshore profits for U.S. income tax purposes. As long as the foreign earnings that accumulated in the tax haven were not remitted to the United States, the U.S. tax bill was delayed. There are several Internal Revenue Code provisions, however, that curb or, in some cases, totally eliminate deferral benefits sought in this manner. Among these are the formidable Subpart F rules for controlled foreign corporations and the passive foreign investment company provisions. Nonetheless, with careful tax planning, foreign subsidiaries that engage in certain types of offshore business activities, notably manufacturing, can still navigate around these anti-haven tax shoals and enjoy substantial deferral benefits. Other foreign subsidiaries, in contrast to traditional wisdom, may set their course directly toward these anti-haven tax shoals in order to secure significant foreign tax credits. Due to the reduced corporate rates introduced by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, most U.S. multinational companies today find themselves in excess tax credit positions.' Accordingly, any foreign taxes they pay above the U.S. statutory rate of 34% are not allowed as a credit against their U.S. tax liability, a fact that directly reduces the company's bottom line, unless it can utilize these \"excess\" credits during the statutory carryover period. In many cases, companies can capture tax advantages by shifting some overseas operations from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax jurisdictions. Shifting operations","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z385W63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Traditionally, one of the advantages of doing business abroad through a foreign subsidiary has been the possibility of using tax havens to minimize foreign income taxes and, at the same time, defer the offshore profits for U.S. income tax purposes. As long as the foreign earnings that accumulated in the tax haven were not remitted to the United States, the U.S. tax bill was delayed. There are several Internal Revenue Code provisions, however, that curb or, in some cases, totally eliminate deferral benefits sought in this manner. Among these are the formidable Subpart F rules for controlled foreign corporations and the passive foreign investment company provisions. Nonetheless, with careful tax planning, foreign subsidiaries that engage in certain types of offshore business activities, notably manufacturing, can still navigate around these anti-haven tax shoals and enjoy substantial deferral benefits. Other foreign subsidiaries, in contrast to traditional wisdom, may set their course directly toward these anti-haven tax shoals in order to secure significant foreign tax credits. Due to the reduced corporate rates introduced by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, most U.S. multinational companies today find themselves in excess tax credit positions.' Accordingly, any foreign taxes they pay above the U.S. statutory rate of 34% are not allowed as a credit against their U.S. tax liability, a fact that directly reduces the company's bottom line, unless it can utilize these "excess" credits during the statutory carryover period. In many cases, companies can capture tax advantages by shifting some overseas operations from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax jurisdictions. Shifting operations
传统上,通过外国子公司在海外开展业务的优势之一是,可以利用避税天堂将外国所得税降至最低,同时,为了美国所得税的目的,可以推迟离岸利润。只要在避税天堂积累的海外收入没有汇到美国,美国的税单就会被推迟。但是,《国内税收法》有几项规定限制或在某些情况下完全取消以这种方式寻求的递延福利。其中包括针对受控外国公司和被动外国投资公司的严格的F部分规定。尽管如此,通过仔细的税务规划,从事某些类型的离岸业务活动(尤其是制造业)的外国子公司仍然可以绕过这些“反避税天堂”,并享受大量的递延优惠。与传统智慧不同的是,其他外国子公司可能会直接向这些反避税天堂的“浅滩”进发,以获得大量的外国税收抵免。由于1986年《税收改革法案》(Tax Reform Act of 1986)降低了企业税率,大多数美国跨国公司如今发现自己处于超额的税收抵免状态。因此,他们支付的任何高于美国法定税率34%的外国税款都不允许作为他们在美国纳税义务的抵免,这一事实直接降低了公司的底线,除非它能在法定结转期间利用这些“超额”抵免。在许多情况下,企业可以通过将一些海外业务从高税收管辖区转移到低税收管辖区来获得税收优势。转移操作