Royal Policies, Local Alternatives

The Puritans Pub Date : 2019-11-12 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvh8qx1q.9
D. D. Hall
{"title":"Royal Policies, Local Alternatives","authors":"D. D. Hall","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvh8qx1q.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the early decades of the seventeenth century, when James VI of Scotland became James I of England and controversy about worship and the structure of the state church erupted anew in Scotland. When James I succeeded Elizabeth I in 1603 and added England, Wales, and Ireland to his native Scotland, the hopeful and the admiring outnumbered the detractors, for the godly knew that in 1592 he had endorsed presbyterianism in Scotland and, more recently, had disparaged Catholicism and Dutch Arminianism. Their hopes aroused, a small group of English activists initiated a petition the king received as he made his way to London. The “Millenary Petition,” so named because of the assertion it was endorsed by a thousand ministers, complained of pluralism and nonresidency, singled out bishops as pluralists although otherwise saying nothing about episcopacy, and called for higher standards in admitting men to the work of ministry. The Millenary Petition signaled the persistence of Puritan sympathies in England despite the damage done to the movement in the 1590s. The chapter also considers “Dutch Puritanism,” a convenient shorthand for the more radical or safety-seeking laypeople and ministers who went to the Netherlands as early as the 1580s.","PeriodicalId":356470,"journal":{"name":"The Puritans","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Puritans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh8qx1q.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the early decades of the seventeenth century, when James VI of Scotland became James I of England and controversy about worship and the structure of the state church erupted anew in Scotland. When James I succeeded Elizabeth I in 1603 and added England, Wales, and Ireland to his native Scotland, the hopeful and the admiring outnumbered the detractors, for the godly knew that in 1592 he had endorsed presbyterianism in Scotland and, more recently, had disparaged Catholicism and Dutch Arminianism. Their hopes aroused, a small group of English activists initiated a petition the king received as he made his way to London. The “Millenary Petition,” so named because of the assertion it was endorsed by a thousand ministers, complained of pluralism and nonresidency, singled out bishops as pluralists although otherwise saying nothing about episcopacy, and called for higher standards in admitting men to the work of ministry. The Millenary Petition signaled the persistence of Puritan sympathies in England despite the damage done to the movement in the 1590s. The chapter also considers “Dutch Puritanism,” a convenient shorthand for the more radical or safety-seeking laypeople and ministers who went to the Netherlands as early as the 1580s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皇家政策,地方选择
这一章探讨了17世纪早期的几十年,当时苏格兰的詹姆斯六世成为英格兰的詹姆斯一世,关于崇拜和国教结构的争论在苏格兰重新爆发。当詹姆斯一世在1603年接替伊丽莎白一世,将英格兰、威尔士和爱尔兰加入他的家乡苏格兰时,对他充满希望和赞赏的人远远多于对他的诋毁,因为虔诚的人们知道,在1592年,他支持苏格兰的长老会,最近,他还贬低了天主教和荷兰的阿民念主义。他们燃起了希望,一小群英国积极分子发起了一份请愿书,国王在前往伦敦的途中收到了请愿书。“千禧年请愿书”之所以如此命名,是因为它声称得到了一千名牧师的支持,它抱怨多元主义和无居留权,把主教单独列为多元主义者,尽管除此之外没有提到主教的问题,并呼吁在接纳男性从事神职工作时提高标准。千禧年请愿书表明,尽管1590年代清教运动遭到破坏,但英国人对清教的同情依然存在。本章还讨论了“荷兰清教主义”,这是对早在1580年代就前往荷兰的更激进或寻求安全的俗人和牧师的方便简称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter Five. A Reformation of Manners Chapter Eight. The End of the Beginning, 1640–1660 Frontmatter Index Chapter Nine. Change and Continuity:Theology and Social Practice, c. 1640–1660
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1