Book Discussion

Igor Logvinenko
{"title":"Book Discussion","authors":"Igor Logvinenko","doi":"10.30965/22142290-00702004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corruption as a Last Resort is an impressive study that makes new and important contributions to the scholarship on corruption in Central Asia and across a broader range of low-income countries. The book is a powerful critique of market liberalization policies of the past two decades. McMann’s research points to a strong connection between market reform and the prevalence of corruption, especially in the context of state interventionist legacy and underdeveloped market-enhancing institutions. The connection between market reform and individual behavior that McMann uncovers runs against the expectations of those who have promoted market reforms in transition economies. The argument advanced in the book suggests that instead of reducing the role of the state in the economy, failed market reform created an environment in which individuals caught in difficult economic circumstances turned to petty corruption as their last resort. Reforms increased popular demand for corrupt behavior by state officials. Lacking market opportunities or personal networks, individuals resorted to patronage-based relationships with state officials. Corruption as the Last Resort is an ambitious project that not only introduces a novel theoretical framework, but also marshals impressive evidence (original survey and interview data) to support it. For example, in McMann’s nuanced theory, market reform is especially harmful to the welfare of the poorest citizens when there has been a long history of state involvement in the economy. In other words, reduction in redistributionist policies results in fewer funds directed to the neediest citizens; the people who previously relied the most on government aid. The weak market-enhancing institutions so common in the post-socialist transition context preclude the creation of market alternatives to the state, leaving no alternatives to petty corruption.","PeriodicalId":351033,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Affairs","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/22142290-00702004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corruption as a Last Resort is an impressive study that makes new and important contributions to the scholarship on corruption in Central Asia and across a broader range of low-income countries. The book is a powerful critique of market liberalization policies of the past two decades. McMann’s research points to a strong connection between market reform and the prevalence of corruption, especially in the context of state interventionist legacy and underdeveloped market-enhancing institutions. The connection between market reform and individual behavior that McMann uncovers runs against the expectations of those who have promoted market reforms in transition economies. The argument advanced in the book suggests that instead of reducing the role of the state in the economy, failed market reform created an environment in which individuals caught in difficult economic circumstances turned to petty corruption as their last resort. Reforms increased popular demand for corrupt behavior by state officials. Lacking market opportunities or personal networks, individuals resorted to patronage-based relationships with state officials. Corruption as the Last Resort is an ambitious project that not only introduces a novel theoretical framework, but also marshals impressive evidence (original survey and interview data) to support it. For example, in McMann’s nuanced theory, market reform is especially harmful to the welfare of the poorest citizens when there has been a long history of state involvement in the economy. In other words, reduction in redistributionist policies results in fewer funds directed to the neediest citizens; the people who previously relied the most on government aid. The weak market-enhancing institutions so common in the post-socialist transition context preclude the creation of market alternatives to the state, leaving no alternatives to petty corruption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书讨论
《作为最后手段的腐败》是一项令人印象深刻的研究,为研究中亚和更广泛的低收入国家腐败的学术研究做出了新的重要贡献。这本书是对过去20年市场自由化政策的有力批判。麦克曼的研究指出,市场改革与腐败盛行之间有着密切的联系,特别是在国家干预主义遗留问题和不发达的市场强化机构的背景下。麦克曼所揭示的市场改革与个人行为之间的联系,与那些在转型经济体中推动市场改革的人的期望背道而驰。书中提出的论点表明,失败的市场改革非但没有减少国家在经济中的作用,反而创造了一种环境,使陷入经济困境的个人将轻微腐败作为最后的手段。改革增加了民众对国家官员腐败行为的要求。由于缺乏市场机会或人际网络,个人求助于与国家官员建立的庇护关系。作为最后手段的腐败是一个雄心勃勃的项目,它不仅引入了一个新的理论框架,而且还汇集了令人印象深刻的证据(原始调查和访谈数据)来支持它。例如,在麦克曼细致入微的理论中,当国家长期介入经济时,市场改革对最贫困公民的福利尤其有害。换句话说,再分配政策的减少导致用于最贫困公民的资金减少;那些以前最依赖政府援助的人。在社会主义转型后的背景下,软弱的市场促进机制如此普遍,阻碍了市场替代国家的诞生,导致除了轻微的腐败之外别无选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Central Asian International Relations in Decolonial Age Maize-farming Forever? Is the New Path a Modified Old Path? Decolonising Actors and Vocabulary in International Relations of Central Asia Decolonial Central Asia, or a Post-liberal One?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1