Indigenising and Africanising South Africa's Approaches to Curbing COVID-19 in South Africa: An Integrated Approach

Joseph Makanda, Emmanuel Matambo
{"title":"Indigenising and Africanising South Africa's Approaches to Curbing COVID-19 in South Africa: An Integrated Approach","authors":"Joseph Makanda, Emmanuel Matambo","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2021.1993077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract South Africa‘s declaration of a state of pandemic on 27 March 2020 to combat the spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has elicited debates on the impact of government's policy responses, such as national lockdowns, on the economy of the country. Some pundits support lockdown measures by arguing that they save many lives. Others acknowledge the efficacy of lockdowns in combating the spread of COVID-19 but argue that they have a devastating impact on the economy and livelihoods. However, both pro- and anti-lockdown commentators neglect African indigenous approaches in combatting the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The current paper offers a consolidated approach on how African indigenous approaches might be practically and pragmatically integrated with South Africa‘s COVID-19 policy responses. Drawing on Afrocentric theory, this paper argues that a combination of Western and African indigenous approaches can be more successful in combating the spread of COVID-19 if they are incorporated into a synthesis that adopts useful elements of each. This paper argues that by insisting on national lockdowns, social distancing, self-isolation, and the use of facemasks and vaccines as the only means of combating COVID-19, the South African government is discrediting the use of indigenous African knowledge.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2021.1993077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract South Africa‘s declaration of a state of pandemic on 27 March 2020 to combat the spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has elicited debates on the impact of government's policy responses, such as national lockdowns, on the economy of the country. Some pundits support lockdown measures by arguing that they save many lives. Others acknowledge the efficacy of lockdowns in combating the spread of COVID-19 but argue that they have a devastating impact on the economy and livelihoods. However, both pro- and anti-lockdown commentators neglect African indigenous approaches in combatting the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The current paper offers a consolidated approach on how African indigenous approaches might be practically and pragmatically integrated with South Africa‘s COVID-19 policy responses. Drawing on Afrocentric theory, this paper argues that a combination of Western and African indigenous approaches can be more successful in combating the spread of COVID-19 if they are incorporated into a synthesis that adopts useful elements of each. This paper argues that by insisting on national lockdowns, social distancing, self-isolation, and the use of facemasks and vaccines as the only means of combating COVID-19, the South African government is discrediting the use of indigenous African knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非应对COVID-19的本土化和非洲化方法:一种综合方法
南非于2020年3月27日宣布进入大流行状态,以对抗新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播,引发了关于政府政策应对措施(如全国封锁)对该国经济影响的辩论。一些权威人士支持封锁措施,认为这可以挽救许多生命。其他人承认封锁在抗击COVID-19传播方面的有效性,但认为封锁对经济和生计造成了破坏性影响。然而,无论是支持还是反对封锁的评论人士,都忽视了非洲应对COVID-19等传染病传播的本土方法。本文提供了一种综合方法,说明如何切实地将非洲本土方法与南非的COVID-19应对政策相结合。根据非洲中心理论,本文认为,如果将西方和非洲的本土方法结合起来,采用各自的有用元素,就可以更成功地遏制COVID-19的传播。本文认为,南非政府坚持将全国封锁、保持社会距离、自我隔离以及使用口罩和疫苗作为抗击COVID-19的唯一手段,这是在抹黑使用非洲本土知识的信誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Afrocentric Analysis of the Practicality of Radical Economic Transformation in the Context of South Africa–China Relations, 2013–2017 Lembede's Afrika for the Afrikans and the Azanian Tradition Today: A Comparative Analysis of Two Forms of Afrikan Nationalism in “South Africa” Is Ifá Divination Girded by Logic? A Case for Ezumezu Logic African Thought and Western (European) Misconception: An Afrocentric Paradigm In Search of Authentic Personhood: An Existentialist Reading of Femi Osofisan’s Tẹgọnni: An African Antigone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1