Religious Beliefs and the Limits of Their Accommodation in Russia: Some Landmark Cases of the Russia Supreme Court

M. Antonov
{"title":"Religious Beliefs and the Limits of Their Accommodation in Russia: Some Landmark Cases of the Russia Supreme Court","authors":"M. Antonov","doi":"10.20413/RASCEE.2018.11.1.3-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the case law of the Russian Supreme Court that shapes certain guidelines of accommodation of religious freedoms in Russia. The statutory law does not provide explicit rules and the prevailing doctrine does not directly recognise the idea of accommodation on religious grounds. This puts Russian courts in an ambiguous situation where they are seemingly precluded from granting accommodations. Nonetheless, the Russian courts of general jurisdiction have elaborated certain approaches that allow narrowing or broadening the limits of the protection, and thereby indirectly accepted the idea of accommodation which is absent in the statutory law. The paper examines the criteria and approaches the Russian Supreme Court has formulated in its landmark cases. The paper underscores relevance of such an analysis for comparative research projects that aim at understanding dissimilarities of legal accommodations on religious grounds in different countries and their reasons.","PeriodicalId":161644,"journal":{"name":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20413/RASCEE.2018.11.1.3-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the case law of the Russian Supreme Court that shapes certain guidelines of accommodation of religious freedoms in Russia. The statutory law does not provide explicit rules and the prevailing doctrine does not directly recognise the idea of accommodation on religious grounds. This puts Russian courts in an ambiguous situation where they are seemingly precluded from granting accommodations. Nonetheless, the Russian courts of general jurisdiction have elaborated certain approaches that allow narrowing or broadening the limits of the protection, and thereby indirectly accepted the idea of accommodation which is absent in the statutory law. The paper examines the criteria and approaches the Russian Supreme Court has formulated in its landmark cases. The paper underscores relevance of such an analysis for comparative research projects that aim at understanding dissimilarities of legal accommodations on religious grounds in different countries and their reasons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教信仰及其在俄罗斯的容纳限度:俄罗斯最高法院的一些具有里程碑意义的案例
本文考虑了俄罗斯最高法院的判例法,它塑造了俄罗斯宗教自由的某些指导方针。成文法没有提供明确的规则,现行的教义也不直接承认基于宗教理由的迁就。这使得俄罗斯法院处于一种模棱两可的境地,他们似乎被排除在提供住宿之外。然而,具有一般管辖权的俄罗斯法院拟订了某些办法,允许缩小或扩大保护的范围,从而间接地接受成文法中所没有的通便的概念。本文考察了俄罗斯最高法院在其具有里程碑意义的案件中制定的标准和方法。本文强调了这种分析对旨在了解不同国家基于宗教理由的法律便利的差异及其原因的比较研究项目的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of the state-favored religions in Turkey and Hungary Religion and politics: challenges to the social scientific study of religion Between strangeness and an alternative Buddhist lifestyle: an expression of religious non-conformity in consumer culture The Czech struggle for and against religion in public space: the case of re-erecting of Marian Column in Prague from the perspective of the media On being a transgender man in the Czech pagan community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1