Matheus Dantas Madeira Pontes, Thayanne Lima Duarte Pontes
{"title":"KTT strategies for scientific institutions: understanding the past to help build the future","authors":"Matheus Dantas Madeira Pontes, Thayanne Lima Duarte Pontes","doi":"10.5902/1983465965312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to identify the current situation of the research that analyzes KTT strategies in scientific institutions.\nDesign/methodology/approach – To systematize the empirical evidence that emerged from academic debates in the field, the study breaks down, through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), 42 papers from the Web of Science database. The author divides the sample into three clusters: environmental impact, institutional effectiveness, and individual strategies, according to its unit of analysis.\nFindings – The findings indicate that the alignment of KTT activities with the strategic objectives of the institutions is fundamental for positive outcomes. In addition to that, the resources for obtaining relevant results are the quality and the availability of human capital in scientific institutions, public companies, and support organizations. Finally, there is a stream of research that criticizes the exclusively commercial approach of the phenomenon.\nResearch limitations – The Web of Science database relies on being the manly coverage for scientific publications in general. So, due to the choice for composing this sample with papers written only in English, untranslated studies were excluded from this analysis.\nOriginality/value – The contribution for Literature relies on proposing a future research agenda based on identified gaps and current topics, discussing the results of previous studies that can support the decision-making of these organizations at developing efficient KTT strategies for themselves.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to identify the current situation of the research that analyzes KTT strategies in scientific institutions.
Design/methodology/approach – To systematize the empirical evidence that emerged from academic debates in the field, the study breaks down, through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), 42 papers from the Web of Science database. The author divides the sample into three clusters: environmental impact, institutional effectiveness, and individual strategies, according to its unit of analysis.
Findings – The findings indicate that the alignment of KTT activities with the strategic objectives of the institutions is fundamental for positive outcomes. In addition to that, the resources for obtaining relevant results are the quality and the availability of human capital in scientific institutions, public companies, and support organizations. Finally, there is a stream of research that criticizes the exclusively commercial approach of the phenomenon.
Research limitations – The Web of Science database relies on being the manly coverage for scientific publications in general. So, due to the choice for composing this sample with papers written only in English, untranslated studies were excluded from this analysis.
Originality/value – The contribution for Literature relies on proposing a future research agenda based on identified gaps and current topics, discussing the results of previous studies that can support the decision-making of these organizations at developing efficient KTT strategies for themselves.
目的-本文旨在确定研究的现状,分析科研机构的KTT策略。设计/方法论/方法——为了将该领域学术辩论中出现的经验证据系统化,本研究通过系统文献综述(SLR)对来自Web of Science数据库的42篇论文进行了分解。根据分析单位的不同,作者将样本分为环境影响、制度有效性和个人策略三大类。研究结果-研究结果表明,KTT活动与各机构的战略目标相一致是取得积极成果的基础。除此之外,获得相关结果的资源是科学机构、上市公司和支持组织中人力资本的质量和可用性。最后,有一系列的研究对这种现象的独家商业方法提出了批评。研究局限——科学网络数据库依赖于成为科学出版物的主要覆盖范围。因此,由于选择仅用英文撰写的论文组成本样本,未翻译的研究被排除在本分析之外。原创性/价值-对文献的贡献依赖于根据已确定的差距和当前主题提出未来的研究议程,讨论以前的研究结果,这些研究结果可以支持这些组织在为自己制定有效的KTT战略时的决策。