An Accuracy Test of “Schlumberger” Vertical Electrical Sounding Method in a Sandbox Modelling

I. Arifianto, R. C. Wibowo, M. Priana
{"title":"An Accuracy Test of “Schlumberger” Vertical Electrical Sounding Method in a Sandbox Modelling","authors":"I. Arifianto, R. C. Wibowo, M. Priana","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201900420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary In groundwater exploration, a geophysical method is needed to provide information and an overview of the subsurface conditions of the study area, and the most common practice for giving subsurface information is a geoelectric method or resistivity method. During the acquisition of groundwater exploration, Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) is the most preferred due to convenience and effectiveness. Schlumberger configuration will produce a subsurface profile vertically at an observation point and is the initial step to estimate the presence of aquifers in the groundwater exploration area. However, this method has several geological considerations leading to the inaccurate subsurface interpretation that the presence of dipping layers and subsurface structures such as fault are the main factors. Thus, the presence of that features can affect the modeling of resistivity values and subsurface thickness during interpretation process of the resistivity method. This then becomes the basis of the authors conducting a study that aims to determine the accuracy of the layer thickness produced by the VES resistivity method. However, the existence of subsurface structures is also difficult to predict if there are no supporting by surface data, hence the study modeling of subsurface conditions using a sandbox model will be carried out.","PeriodicalId":393867,"journal":{"name":"EAGE-GSM 2nd Asia Pacific Meeting on Near Surface Geoscience and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAGE-GSM 2nd Asia Pacific Meeting on Near Surface Geoscience and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary In groundwater exploration, a geophysical method is needed to provide information and an overview of the subsurface conditions of the study area, and the most common practice for giving subsurface information is a geoelectric method or resistivity method. During the acquisition of groundwater exploration, Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) is the most preferred due to convenience and effectiveness. Schlumberger configuration will produce a subsurface profile vertically at an observation point and is the initial step to estimate the presence of aquifers in the groundwater exploration area. However, this method has several geological considerations leading to the inaccurate subsurface interpretation that the presence of dipping layers and subsurface structures such as fault are the main factors. Thus, the presence of that features can affect the modeling of resistivity values and subsurface thickness during interpretation process of the resistivity method. This then becomes the basis of the authors conducting a study that aims to determine the accuracy of the layer thickness produced by the VES resistivity method. However, the existence of subsurface structures is also difficult to predict if there are no supporting by surface data, hence the study modeling of subsurface conditions using a sandbox model will be carried out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“斯伦贝谢”垂直电测深方法在沙盒模拟中的精度测试
在地下水勘探中,需要地球物理方法来提供研究区域地下情况的信息和概况,而提供地下信息最常用的方法是地电法或电阻率法。在获取地下水勘探时,斯伦贝谢垂直电测深(VES)因其方便和有效而成为首选。斯伦贝谢的配置将在观测点垂直产生地下剖面,这是估计地下水勘探区域含水层存在的第一步。然而,这种方法有几个地质考虑因素,导致地下解释不准确,倾斜层和地下构造(如断层)的存在是主要因素。因此,在电阻率法解释过程中,这些特征的存在会影响电阻率值和地下厚度的建模。然后,这成为作者进行研究的基础,该研究旨在确定由电测深电阻率法产生的层厚的准确性。然而,如果没有地面数据的支持,地下结构的存在也很难预测,因此将采用沙盒模型对地下条件进行研究建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The inversion of 2-D and 3-D resistivity data from surveys in aquatic areas Reducing ERTM artifact arising from incorrectly imaged mode conversions in the dip-angle domain Utilization of Air Wave to Determine the Quality of Seismic Refraction Data in Near Surface Geophysical Survey Multi-channel GPR surveys for the detection of archaeological remains: A case study from Öland, Sweden Analysis of post-landslide electric imaging data at a site in Sapa, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1