Evaluation of the Significance of Obtaining Two Histopathological Samples from the Same Kidney at Autopsy Examination

H. Sanjeewa, M. Vidanapathirana, U. Attygalle, R. Amararatne, D. Senasinghe
{"title":"Evaluation of the Significance of Obtaining Two Histopathological Samples from the Same Kidney at Autopsy Examination","authors":"H. Sanjeewa, M. Vidanapathirana, U. Attygalle, R. Amararatne, D. Senasinghe","doi":"10.4038/mljsl.v8i1.7404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Histopathology examination is a common and recommended practice among all types of autopsy practitioners; there are few scientific outlooks guidelines or protocols about the number of samples that need to be obtained at autopsy for the histopathology examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of taking multiple samples from the same kidney at autopsy examination. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive prospective study was carried out among 108 post mortem reports and histopathology samples at the department of forensic medicine of Base Hospital Panadura and District General Hospital Kalutara and Kegalle. All autopsies with available microscopic samples of kidney irrespective of the cause of death were used for the study. The data collection process was carried out from November 2019 to February 2020 and the ethical clearance was obtained prior to the data collection. Results: Data from the 108 post mortem reports were obtained. The studied sample consists of 69% (n=74) of males and 31% (n=34) females. With regard to the age distribution, the majority of 40% (n=43) cases belonged to the 51-70 age category. 69% (n=74) samples were collected from the left kidney while remaining 31% (n=34) from the right. Considering the macroscopic appearance of the kidney, cortical thickness reduction was noted among 34% (n=37) samples followed by granular contracted kidney of 31% (n=33). In the microscopic findings, the different numbers of pathologies were identified in both samples. However, the 1st sample had a higher frequency of histopathological findings than sample 2 and no significant difference in identification pathologies between 1st sample and 2nd samples were determined (p= 0.784>0.05.) Conclusion: Taking two samples from same kidney during the autopsy does not suggest statistical difference. However, where the resources are available it is suggested that taking two samples is beneficial.","PeriodicalId":446761,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Legal Journal of Sri Lanka","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Legal Journal of Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/mljsl.v8i1.7404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Histopathology examination is a common and recommended practice among all types of autopsy practitioners; there are few scientific outlooks guidelines or protocols about the number of samples that need to be obtained at autopsy for the histopathology examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of taking multiple samples from the same kidney at autopsy examination. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive prospective study was carried out among 108 post mortem reports and histopathology samples at the department of forensic medicine of Base Hospital Panadura and District General Hospital Kalutara and Kegalle. All autopsies with available microscopic samples of kidney irrespective of the cause of death were used for the study. The data collection process was carried out from November 2019 to February 2020 and the ethical clearance was obtained prior to the data collection. Results: Data from the 108 post mortem reports were obtained. The studied sample consists of 69% (n=74) of males and 31% (n=34) females. With regard to the age distribution, the majority of 40% (n=43) cases belonged to the 51-70 age category. 69% (n=74) samples were collected from the left kidney while remaining 31% (n=34) from the right. Considering the macroscopic appearance of the kidney, cortical thickness reduction was noted among 34% (n=37) samples followed by granular contracted kidney of 31% (n=33). In the microscopic findings, the different numbers of pathologies were identified in both samples. However, the 1st sample had a higher frequency of histopathological findings than sample 2 and no significant difference in identification pathologies between 1st sample and 2nd samples were determined (p= 0.784>0.05.) Conclusion: Taking two samples from same kidney during the autopsy does not suggest statistical difference. However, where the resources are available it is suggested that taking two samples is beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从同一肾脏获得两份组织病理标本在尸检中的意义评价
简介:组织病理学检查是一种常见的和推荐的做法,在所有类型的尸检从业者;关于解剖中需要获得的组织病理学检查样本的数量,几乎没有科学的观点、指南或方案。本研究的目的是评估从同一肾脏提取多个样本在尸检检查中的价值。方法:对帕纳杜拉基地医院和卡鲁塔拉和凯格勒地区总医院法医学部门的108份尸检报告和组织病理学样本进行了横断面描述性前瞻性研究。无论死因如何,所有可获得肾脏显微标本的尸检都被用于研究。数据收集过程于2019年11月至2020年2月进行,并在数据收集之前获得了伦理许可。结果:从108例尸检报告中获得数据。研究样本中男性占69% (n=74),女性占31% (n=34)。在年龄分布上,40% (n=43)的病例属于51-70岁年龄组。69% (n=74)的样本来自左肾,其余31% (n=34)来自右肾。考虑到肾脏的宏观外观,34% (n=37)的样本出现皮质厚度减少,其次是31% (n=33)的颗粒状肾脏收缩。在显微镜下的发现,不同数量的病理被确定在两个样本。然而,第1个样本的组织病理发现频率高于样本2,第1个样本和第2个样本的鉴定病理无显著差异(p= 0.784 bb0 0.05)。结论:解剖时取同一肾脏两份标本无统计学差异。然而,在资源可用的情况下,建议取两个样本是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Injuries Due to Improvised Explosive Devices Fatalities Following Fall from Heights Presented to Three Medico-Legal Units in Sri Lanka Analysis of Medico-legal Death Investigation on Allegations of Elder Abuse in Seattle, Washington Identification of the Vehicle of a Hit-and-Run Accident Based on Patterned Evidence Impact of Post-mortem PCR Testing on Lead Time of the Medico-legal Death Investigation. A Retrospective Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1