Performance in Covid-19 Vaccination in The First Half Year: A Review and Analysis of Decentralized and Centralized Vaccination Organizations

{"title":"Performance in Covid-19 Vaccination in The First Half Year: A Review and Analysis of Decentralized and Centralized Vaccination Organizations","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jnh.08.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western industrialized countries had similar vaccination policies in the COVID-19 pandemic but different vaccination organizations. Analyzing their performance in terms of publicly available vaccination rates revealed that decentralized as in the United States and centralized systems as in the United Kingdom had comparable start peak performance on international level and showed no significant differences in performance on a subnational level in Germany. In comparing peak performance, a mixture of both systems showed a 0.95% higher protection rate which would have resulted in estimated 17’995 less infections, 251 less Covid-19 related death and US$ 4.3 million less hospitalization costs in the United States. A mixture of centralized vaccination organization such as vaccination centers and decentralized vaccination through regional doctor practices deliver best results in the first phase of pandemic outbreaks given the first half year experience in the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":302843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.08.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Western industrialized countries had similar vaccination policies in the COVID-19 pandemic but different vaccination organizations. Analyzing their performance in terms of publicly available vaccination rates revealed that decentralized as in the United States and centralized systems as in the United Kingdom had comparable start peak performance on international level and showed no significant differences in performance on a subnational level in Germany. In comparing peak performance, a mixture of both systems showed a 0.95% higher protection rate which would have resulted in estimated 17’995 less infections, 251 less Covid-19 related death and US$ 4.3 million less hospitalization costs in the United States. A mixture of centralized vaccination organization such as vaccination centers and decentralized vaccination through regional doctor practices deliver best results in the first phase of pandemic outbreaks given the first half year experience in the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上半年Covid-19疫苗接种工作绩效:分散和集中疫苗接种组织回顾与分析
西方工业化国家在新冠肺炎大流行期间采取了类似的疫苗接种政策,但接种机构不同。根据可公开获得的疫苗接种率分析它们的表现表明,在国际层面上,像美国这样的分散式系统和像英国这样的集中式系统的开始峰值表现相当,在德国的次国家层面上的表现没有显着差异。在比较峰值性能时,两种系统的混合显示出0.95%的高保护率,这将导致美国的感染减少17995例,与Covid-19相关的死亡减少251例,住院费用减少430万美元。鉴于2019冠状病毒病前半年的经验,疫苗接种中心等集中式疫苗接种组织与通过区域医生实践进行的分散式疫苗接种相结合,在大流行暴发的第一阶段可取得最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Iot Embedded Systems Along the Line of Identity Access Management for Enhanced Health Data Security The Effect of Psychoactive Substances Used on Clinical Outcomes in Injured Drivers Referred to Emergency Medicine; Case-Control Study A Thorough Study and Meta-Analysis of The Prognostic Relevance of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio in Acute Pancreatitis Understanding Pap Smears, HPV, and Preventive Measures in Relation to Cervical Health An Exploration/Investigation of General Practitioners’ and General Practice Nurses’ Opinions on Physical Activity Promotion to their Patients in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1