Evolution of fault tolerance

K. Birman
{"title":"Evolution of fault tolerance","authors":"K. Birman","doi":"10.1145/2830903.2830908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ken Birman's talk focused on controversies surrounding fault-tolerance and consistency. Looking at the 1990's, he pointed to debate around the so-called CATOCS question (CATOCS refers to causally and totally ordered communication primitives) and drew a parallel to the more modern debate about consistency at cloud scale (often referred to as the CAP conjecture). Ken argued that the underlying tension is actually one that opposes basic principles of the field against the seemingly unavoidable complexity of mechanisms strong enough to solve consensus, particularly the family of protocols with Paxos-like structures. Over time, this was resolved: He concluded that today, we finally know how to build very fast and scalable solutions (those who attended SOSP 2015 itself saw ten or more of the paper on such topics). On the other hand, Ken sees a new generation of challenges on the horizon: cloud-scale applications that will need a novel mix of scalable consistency and real-time guarantees, will need to leverage new new hardware options (RDMA, NVRAM and other \"middle memory\" options), and may need to be restructured to reflect a control-plane/data-plane split. These trends invite a new look at what has become a core topic for the SOSP community.","PeriodicalId":175724,"journal":{"name":"SOSP History Day 2015","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOSP History Day 2015","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2830903.2830908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Ken Birman's talk focused on controversies surrounding fault-tolerance and consistency. Looking at the 1990's, he pointed to debate around the so-called CATOCS question (CATOCS refers to causally and totally ordered communication primitives) and drew a parallel to the more modern debate about consistency at cloud scale (often referred to as the CAP conjecture). Ken argued that the underlying tension is actually one that opposes basic principles of the field against the seemingly unavoidable complexity of mechanisms strong enough to solve consensus, particularly the family of protocols with Paxos-like structures. Over time, this was resolved: He concluded that today, we finally know how to build very fast and scalable solutions (those who attended SOSP 2015 itself saw ten or more of the paper on such topics). On the other hand, Ken sees a new generation of challenges on the horizon: cloud-scale applications that will need a novel mix of scalable consistency and real-time guarantees, will need to leverage new new hardware options (RDMA, NVRAM and other "middle memory" options), and may need to be restructured to reflect a control-plane/data-plane split. These trends invite a new look at what has become a core topic for the SOSP community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
容错性的演变
Ken Birman的演讲集中在围绕容错和一致性的争议上。回顾20世纪90年代,他指出了围绕所谓CATOCS问题(CATOCS指的是因果关系和完全有序的通信原语)的争论,并将其与更现代的关于云规模一致性的争论(通常被称为CAP猜想)进行了类比。Ken认为,潜在的紧张关系实际上是反对该领域的基本原则,反对看似不可避免的机制复杂性,这些机制强大到足以解决共识,特别是具有paxos结构的协议家族。随着时间的推移,这个问题得到了解决:他总结说,今天,我们终于知道如何构建非常快速和可扩展的解决方案(参加SOSP 2015的人看到了十篇或更多关于此类主题的论文)。另一方面,Ken看到了即将出现的新一代挑战:云规模的应用程序将需要可扩展一致性和实时保证的新组合,将需要利用新的硬件选项(RDMA、NVRAM和其他“中间内存”选项),并且可能需要重新构建以反映控制平面/数据平面的分裂。这些趋势促使人们重新审视已经成为SOSP社区核心话题的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on system languages and abstraction The network and the OS Virtualization The founding of the SOSP conferences Reminiscences on SOSP history day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1