Mainstreaming gender equality in smart cities: Theoretical, methodological and empirical challenges

Inf. Polity Pub Date : 2019-08-27 DOI:10.3233/IP-190134
Giorgia Nesti
{"title":"Mainstreaming gender equality in smart cities: Theoretical, methodological and empirical challenges","authors":"Giorgia Nesti","doi":"10.3233/IP-190134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate on local governance and urban innovation has recently gained impetus due to the diffusion of the smart city approach. A city can be defined ‘smart’ if it adopts an innovative collaborative governance style to design urban policies aimed at improving citizens’ quality of life and at promoting environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Notwithstanding the fact that civic participation and inclusion should be distinctive characteristics of smart cities, gender inequalities are often disregarded both by academic literature and in the implementation of smart strategies. The paper is aimed at filling this gap by addressing three issues. Starting from a systematic analysis of literature the paper investigates whether, where, how and why gender discriminations could emerge in a smart city. Second, it proposes a set of tools to mainstream gender in smart city governance and possible areas of intervention to reduce gender inequalities in smart cities. Third it tries to identify main theoretical, methodological, and empirical challenges for local administrators that hamper the implementation of gender equality strategies in smart cities.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The debate on local governance and urban innovation has recently gained impetus due to the diffusion of the smart city approach. A city can be defined ‘smart’ if it adopts an innovative collaborative governance style to design urban policies aimed at improving citizens’ quality of life and at promoting environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Notwithstanding the fact that civic participation and inclusion should be distinctive characteristics of smart cities, gender inequalities are often disregarded both by academic literature and in the implementation of smart strategies. The paper is aimed at filling this gap by addressing three issues. Starting from a systematic analysis of literature the paper investigates whether, where, how and why gender discriminations could emerge in a smart city. Second, it proposes a set of tools to mainstream gender in smart city governance and possible areas of intervention to reduce gender inequalities in smart cities. Third it tries to identify main theoretical, methodological, and empirical challenges for local administrators that hamper the implementation of gender equality strategies in smart cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智慧城市性别平等主流化:理论、方法和经验挑战
由于智慧城市方法的普及,关于地方治理和城市创新的辩论最近得到了推动。如果一个城市采用创新的协同治理方式来设计旨在提高市民生活质量和促进环境、经济和社会可持续性的城市政策,那么它就可以被定义为“智能”城市。尽管公民参与和包容应该是智慧城市的显著特征,但学术文献和智慧战略的实施往往忽视了性别不平等。本文旨在通过解决三个问题来填补这一空白。本文从系统的文献分析出发,探讨了智慧城市中是否会出现性别歧视,在哪里,如何以及为什么会出现性别歧视。其次,它提出了一套将性别主流化到智慧城市治理中的工具和可能的干预领域,以减少智慧城市中的性别不平等。第三,它试图确定阻碍智慧城市性别平等战略实施的地方管理者面临的主要理论、方法和经验挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Review: The Evolving Governance of Surveillance Cameras in the UK Editorial: Improving Diversity in our Journal Two Editorials: An Editorial by the Editors-in-Chief and an Editorial by ChatGPT The Dutch Open Government Act: Bridging old and new open government? The Power of Partnership in Open Government: Reconsidering Multistakeholder Governance Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1