First genocide, now ecocide: an anti-life force in organisations?

P. Hoggett, Rebecca A Nestor
{"title":"First genocide, now ecocide: an anti-life force in organisations?","authors":"P. Hoggett, Rebecca A Nestor","doi":"10.33212/osd.v21n1.2021.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most contributions to OSD have assumed that organisations are beset by various anxieties—some inherent to their work, some to the social context in which they operate—which threaten to blow them off course. If not managed effectively these anxieties generate various defences—splitting, denial, dissociation, etc.—which undermine the capacity to engage creatively with the organisation's internal and external reality. Many of the organisations studied, in healthcare, education, etc., ostensibly have a public purpose, but what of those organisations whose purpose is antisocial, where their business is primarily to destroy rather than create? The group relations tradition emerged from the aftermath of the Holocaust and genocide. Today the genocidal impulse has become conjoined with an ecocidal one; as a result we stand on the brink of disaster. This article explores the \"structures of feeling\" in organisations as our existential fears reach acute levels, and asks whether we need to extend our frame of analysis beyond the anxieties and defences provoked by our destructiveness in order to better understand humanity's apparent embrace of destructiveness.","PeriodicalId":440453,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth Anniversary Special Issue","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth Anniversary Special Issue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v21n1.2021.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most contributions to OSD have assumed that organisations are beset by various anxieties—some inherent to their work, some to the social context in which they operate—which threaten to blow them off course. If not managed effectively these anxieties generate various defences—splitting, denial, dissociation, etc.—which undermine the capacity to engage creatively with the organisation's internal and external reality. Many of the organisations studied, in healthcare, education, etc., ostensibly have a public purpose, but what of those organisations whose purpose is antisocial, where their business is primarily to destroy rather than create? The group relations tradition emerged from the aftermath of the Holocaust and genocide. Today the genocidal impulse has become conjoined with an ecocidal one; as a result we stand on the brink of disaster. This article explores the "structures of feeling" in organisations as our existential fears reach acute levels, and asks whether we need to extend our frame of analysis beyond the anxieties and defences provoked by our destructiveness in order to better understand humanity's apparent embrace of destructiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先是种族灭绝,现在是生态灭绝:组织中的反生命力量?
大多数对OSD的贡献都假设组织被各种焦虑所困扰,这些焦虑有些来自于他们的工作,有些来自于他们运作的社会环境,这些焦虑可能会使他们偏离轨道。如果不能有效地管理这些焦虑,就会产生各种各样的防御——分裂、否认、分离等——从而削弱创造性地应对组织内部和外部现实的能力。在医疗保健、教育等领域,我们研究的许多组织表面上都有一个公共目的,但那些目的是反社会的组织呢?它们的业务主要是破坏而不是创造。群体关系传统产生于大屠杀和种族灭绝之后。今天,种族灭绝的冲动已经与生态灭绝的冲动结合在一起;因此,我们站在灾难的边缘。这篇文章探讨了当我们的存在主义恐惧达到急性水平时,组织中的“感觉结构”,并询问我们是否需要扩展我们的分析框架,超越我们的破坏性所引发的焦虑和防御,以便更好地理解人类对破坏性的明显拥抱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychoanalytic, systems psychodynamic, socioanalytic, and group relations developments of the last two decades The exploring difference workshop: group relations methodology to deepen anti-racist education in Toronto, Canada Executive group coaching: interventions not for the faint of heart Lord of the flies: a psychoanalytic view of the gang and its processes Extending the Tavistock model: bringing desire, danger, dread, and excitement into a theory of organisational process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1