(Dys)Function in the Moors: Everyone's a Villain in Wuthering Heights

Samantha Przybylowicz
{"title":"(Dys)Function in the Moors: Everyone's a Villain in Wuthering Heights","authors":"Samantha Przybylowicz","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emily Bronte's classic Wuthering Heights combines legends, myths, and notions of romance, but it is also full of villains, dastardly acts, betrayal and revenge. Criticism of the work often centers around the characters of Heathcliff and Catherine1 and their perceived feelings for one another, thwarted by fate, chance, and bad decisions.2 Many scholars point fingers at Heathcliff as being the ultimate \"villain\" of the story3; I, however, believe that the term \"villain\" is controversial, and this term can apply to all of the characters, not just Heathcliff-at least in the context of the world where the story takes place. In general, the villain can be a character who wishes evil things to happen and who helps to make these evil things happen. The villain may also be the dark side of human nature, the opposite of the hero, or what the hero could become if s/he ever fails. If we indeed have no heroes in Wuthering Heights, then the characters in the novel must all have a dark side (which may or may not be obvious), or be outright malicious in their intentions through their actions.The novel has no \"good\" characters-even the Lintons, whom Nelly our narrator describes as virtuous, have cruel intentions as they are introduced fighting over a dog, and they repeatedly exhibit passive behaviors where action is called for. For the inhabitants of the moors, villainy is linked with identity, but the characters of Wuthering Heights tend to defy definition and boundaries. Villainy is ascribed to \"otherness\" and that which is not understood; because of misunderstandings and biased attitudes of most characters, readers form negative opinions and assume villainy before evil deeds are performed. Villainy in the novel therefore stems, at least in part, from social condemnation of certain characters early on in the novel.Heathcliff often receives most of the criticism for being the most definitive villain in the novel; however, I believe he merely is placed in this position through the Nelly/Lockwood narration frame, which causes him to appear to exceed the villainy of other characters.4 Overall, I believe Heathcliff gets too much blame from critics for being devilish. In no way do I intend to excuse his behaviors- particularly in the second half of the novel-nor do I have any romanticized notions of his heroism (as Isabella Linton does). What I fail to see, is how he is considered to be so much worse than many of the other characters of the novel to be examined here. Truly, after Catherine's death we see a desperate man: a man who goes so far as to throw a knife at his own wife and has disdain for all around him in the living world. Ingrid Geerken makes a claim in her article '\"The Dead Are Not Annihilated': Mortal Regret in 'Wuthering Heights'\" that Heathcliff is the only character to draw blood: \"Only Heathcliff ever draws blood in the novel, and he does so in order to entice Catherine's shade to appear to him. These injuries constitute a sacrificial offering to the dead\" (396). Here, Geerken even justifies his violence by ascribing a cause-and-effect thought process. If Heathcliff performs evil acts, he believes Catherine's ghost will appear. Why would Catherine be enticed by wicked behavior, unless she herself is inherently evil and villainous?Also, there are several other instances in the novel where blood is drawn, which involve Catherine. One moment is when Lockwood is \"dreaming\" (as he believes he must have been) that Catherine is outside his window. He severs her wrist on the broken glass, and describes the blood spilling down the windowsill: \"I pulled its wrist on to the broken pane, and rubbed it to and fro till the blood ran down and soaked the bed-clothes...\" (25). Although only a dream and not real blood, the imagery in this passage is very strong and stays with the reader. Another instance of bloodshed is much simpler and easily goes by unnoticed; it is when Heathcliff has left the moors after Catherine has decided to marry Edgar and she falls into a delirium. …","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Emily Bronte's classic Wuthering Heights combines legends, myths, and notions of romance, but it is also full of villains, dastardly acts, betrayal and revenge. Criticism of the work often centers around the characters of Heathcliff and Catherine1 and their perceived feelings for one another, thwarted by fate, chance, and bad decisions.2 Many scholars point fingers at Heathcliff as being the ultimate "villain" of the story3; I, however, believe that the term "villain" is controversial, and this term can apply to all of the characters, not just Heathcliff-at least in the context of the world where the story takes place. In general, the villain can be a character who wishes evil things to happen and who helps to make these evil things happen. The villain may also be the dark side of human nature, the opposite of the hero, or what the hero could become if s/he ever fails. If we indeed have no heroes in Wuthering Heights, then the characters in the novel must all have a dark side (which may or may not be obvious), or be outright malicious in their intentions through their actions.The novel has no "good" characters-even the Lintons, whom Nelly our narrator describes as virtuous, have cruel intentions as they are introduced fighting over a dog, and they repeatedly exhibit passive behaviors where action is called for. For the inhabitants of the moors, villainy is linked with identity, but the characters of Wuthering Heights tend to defy definition and boundaries. Villainy is ascribed to "otherness" and that which is not understood; because of misunderstandings and biased attitudes of most characters, readers form negative opinions and assume villainy before evil deeds are performed. Villainy in the novel therefore stems, at least in part, from social condemnation of certain characters early on in the novel.Heathcliff often receives most of the criticism for being the most definitive villain in the novel; however, I believe he merely is placed in this position through the Nelly/Lockwood narration frame, which causes him to appear to exceed the villainy of other characters.4 Overall, I believe Heathcliff gets too much blame from critics for being devilish. In no way do I intend to excuse his behaviors- particularly in the second half of the novel-nor do I have any romanticized notions of his heroism (as Isabella Linton does). What I fail to see, is how he is considered to be so much worse than many of the other characters of the novel to be examined here. Truly, after Catherine's death we see a desperate man: a man who goes so far as to throw a knife at his own wife and has disdain for all around him in the living world. Ingrid Geerken makes a claim in her article '"The Dead Are Not Annihilated': Mortal Regret in 'Wuthering Heights'" that Heathcliff is the only character to draw blood: "Only Heathcliff ever draws blood in the novel, and he does so in order to entice Catherine's shade to appear to him. These injuries constitute a sacrificial offering to the dead" (396). Here, Geerken even justifies his violence by ascribing a cause-and-effect thought process. If Heathcliff performs evil acts, he believes Catherine's ghost will appear. Why would Catherine be enticed by wicked behavior, unless she herself is inherently evil and villainous?Also, there are several other instances in the novel where blood is drawn, which involve Catherine. One moment is when Lockwood is "dreaming" (as he believes he must have been) that Catherine is outside his window. He severs her wrist on the broken glass, and describes the blood spilling down the windowsill: "I pulled its wrist on to the broken pane, and rubbed it to and fro till the blood ran down and soaked the bed-clothes..." (25). Although only a dream and not real blood, the imagery in this passage is very strong and stays with the reader. Another instance of bloodshed is much simpler and easily goes by unnoticed; it is when Heathcliff has left the moors after Catherine has decided to marry Edgar and she falls into a delirium. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《荒野》中的作用:《呼啸山庄》中人人都是恶棍
艾米莉·勃朗特的经典之作《呼啸山庄》结合了传说、神话和浪漫的概念,但它也充满了恶棍、卑鄙的行为、背叛和复仇。对这部作品的批评通常集中在希斯克利夫和凯瑟琳这两个人物以及他们对彼此的感情上,他们被命运、机遇和错误的决定所挫败许多学者指出希刺克厉夫是这个故事的终极“恶棍”;然而,我认为“恶棍”这个词是有争议的,这个词可以适用于所有的角色,而不仅仅是希斯克利夫——至少在故事发生的世界背景下是这样。一般来说,反派可以是希望坏事发生并帮助坏事发生的角色。反派也可能是人性的阴暗面,是英雄的反面,或者是英雄失败后可能变成的样子。如果我们在《呼啸山庄》中确实没有英雄,那么小说中的人物一定都有黑暗的一面(可能很明显,也可能不明显),或者通过他们的行为来表达他们的意图。小说中没有“好”的人物——即使是我们的叙述者内莉描述的善良的林顿一家,在他们为一条狗而战的时候也有残酷的意图,他们在被要求采取行动的时候反复表现出被动的行为。对于荒原上的居民来说,邪恶是与身份联系在一起的,但《呼啸山庄》中的人物却倾向于挑战定义和界限。邪恶被归咎于“异类”和不被理解的东西;由于大多数角色的误解和偏见,读者在邪恶行为发生之前就形成了负面的看法和邪恶的假设。因此,小说中的邪恶至少部分源于社会对小说早期某些人物的谴责。希斯克利夫经常因为是小说中最具决定性的反派而受到最多的批评;然而,我相信他只是通过Nelly/Lockwood的叙事框架被置于这个位置,这使得他看起来超越了其他角色的邪恶总的来说,我认为希斯克利夫受到了太多批评,因为他太邪恶了。我绝不打算为他的行为辩解——尤其是在小说的后半部分——我也不把他的英雄主义浪漫化(就像伊莎贝拉·林顿那样)。我不明白的是,为什么他被认为比小说中许多其他要研究的人物更糟糕。真的,在凯瑟琳死后,我们看到了一个绝望的男人:一个甚至向自己的妻子扔刀的男人,一个对他周围的人都不屑一顾的男人。英格丽德·格尔肯在她的文章《亡者未被消灭:《呼啸山庄》中的致命遗憾》中声称希斯克利夫是唯一会流血的角色:“小说中只有希斯克利夫会流血,他这样做是为了引诱凯瑟琳的影子出现在他面前。这些伤害构成了对死者的祭品”(396)。在这里,格尔肯甚至为他的暴力行为辩护,将其归因于因果关系的思维过程。如果希斯克利夫做了坏事,他相信凯瑟琳的鬼魂会出现。为什么凯瑟琳会被邪恶的行为所诱惑,除非她本身就是邪恶的?此外,小说中还有其他几个流血的例子,都和凯瑟琳有关。其中一个场景是,洛克伍德正在“做梦”(他相信自己一定是在做梦),凯瑟琳就在他的窗外。他在碎玻璃上割断了她的手腕,并描述了鲜血从窗台上流下来的情景:“我把它的手腕拉到碎玻璃上,来回摩擦,直到鲜血流下来,浸湿了床单……”(25)。虽然这只是一个梦而不是真正的血,但这篇文章中的意象非常强烈,让读者难以忘怀。另一个流血事件要简单得多,很容易被忽视;是在凯瑟琳决定嫁给埃德加,希斯克利夫离开荒野,陷入精神错乱的时候。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter, Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, Issue 20, Spring 2020 Biopolitical Bollywood: Sexual Violence as Cathartic Spectacle in ​Section 375 and ​Article 15 Turning Inward: Using Insight as a Catalyst for Change in "The Corrections" Thematic Fields, Transgressive Religion Revisionist Spectacle? Theatrical Remediation in Alejandro G. Iñárritu's Birdman and Quentin Tarantino's The Hateful Eight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1