Property rights other than rights of ownership as an object of notarised transactions

Oleksii Piddubnyi, Oleg Rohovenko
{"title":"Property rights other than rights of ownership as an object of notarised transactions","authors":"Oleksii Piddubnyi, Oleg Rohovenko","doi":"10.31548/law/2.2023.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the subject is due to the frequency of application of property rights in practice, which led to the emergence of numerous situations when subjects applied to the court to protect their rights. The purpose of the study is to analyse the Ukrainian legislation on property rights other than property rights and to examine them as an object of notarisation. For the search, processing, and presentation of Information, special legal (comparative-legal, formal-legal, and the method of interpretation) and general scientific (formal-logical, analysis, synthesis, concretisation and abstraction, induction and deduction) methods are used. Considering the best practices of judicial practice, the concept of “waiting right” is fixed, which is directly related to objects of construction in progress. The shortcomings contained in the current Civil Code of Ukraine are identified. Attention is drawn to the fact that the planned re-modification of the code will correct many shortcomings existing in the private law sector of legal regulation. The correlation between the concepts of rights of ownership and property rights is outlined, and the absence of regulation of the concept of “property rights” in the Civil Code of Ukraine is stated. The study highlights the state of affairs regarding the notarisation of property rights other than rights of ownership. Changes caused by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine “On Guaranteeing Rights of Ownership to Real Estate Objects That will be Built in the Future” were reported, and its importance for the regulatory plane, in general, are assessed. The problem of definitions of “property rights” and “rights of ownership” is examined. The scientific achievements of outstanding legal researchers are used, whose work is related to the correction of gaps contained in civil legislation, and the problems of insufficient definition of essential terms in regulatory legal acts regulating issues related to the subject under study. The specific features of using property and personal non-property rights in the field of intellectual property are established. The results of the study can be used for further development of doctrinal approaches to improving the institutions of property and rights of ownership.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law/2.2023.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the subject is due to the frequency of application of property rights in practice, which led to the emergence of numerous situations when subjects applied to the court to protect their rights. The purpose of the study is to analyse the Ukrainian legislation on property rights other than property rights and to examine them as an object of notarisation. For the search, processing, and presentation of Information, special legal (comparative-legal, formal-legal, and the method of interpretation) and general scientific (formal-logical, analysis, synthesis, concretisation and abstraction, induction and deduction) methods are used. Considering the best practices of judicial practice, the concept of “waiting right” is fixed, which is directly related to objects of construction in progress. The shortcomings contained in the current Civil Code of Ukraine are identified. Attention is drawn to the fact that the planned re-modification of the code will correct many shortcomings existing in the private law sector of legal regulation. The correlation between the concepts of rights of ownership and property rights is outlined, and the absence of regulation of the concept of “property rights” in the Civil Code of Ukraine is stated. The study highlights the state of affairs regarding the notarisation of property rights other than rights of ownership. Changes caused by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine “On Guaranteeing Rights of Ownership to Real Estate Objects That will be Built in the Future” were reported, and its importance for the regulatory plane, in general, are assessed. The problem of definitions of “property rights” and “rights of ownership” is examined. The scientific achievements of outstanding legal researchers are used, whose work is related to the correction of gaps contained in civil legislation, and the problems of insufficient definition of essential terms in regulatory legal acts regulating issues related to the subject under study. The specific features of using property and personal non-property rights in the field of intellectual property are established. The results of the study can be used for further development of doctrinal approaches to improving the institutions of property and rights of ownership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经公证的交易对象为所有权以外的财产权
主体的相关性是由于产权在实践中适用的频率,导致主体向法院申请保护其权利的情况层出不穷。本研究的目的是分析乌克兰关于财产权以外的财产权的立法,并将其作为公证对象进行审查。对于信息的搜索、处理和呈现,使用特殊的法律(比较法律、形式法律和解释方法)和一般的科学(形式逻辑、分析、综合、具体化和抽象、归纳和演绎)方法。考虑到司法实践的最佳做法,“等待权”的概念是固定的,这与正在进行的建设对象直接相关。指出了现行《乌克兰民法典》所载的缺点。提请注意的是,计划重新修订的《法典》将纠正私法部门法律规章中存在的许多缺点。概述了所有权和财产权概念之间的相互关系,并指出乌克兰民法典中缺乏对“财产权”概念的规定。该研究强调了所有权以外的产权公证的状况。报告了乌克兰法律“关于保障未来将建造的房地产对象所有权的权利”生效所造成的变化,并总体上评估了其对监管层面的重要性。探讨了“产权”和“所有权”的定义问题。本文利用了杰出法律研究者的科学成果,他们的工作涉及纠正民事立法中存在的空白,以及在规范与所研究主题相关的问题的规范性法律行为中对必要术语定义不足的问题。确立了知识产权领域使用财产和个人非财产权利的具体特征。这项研究的结果可用于进一步发展改进财产制度和所有权的理论方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1