Students' perceptions of the differences between formal and informal learning

Jonas Boustedt, Anna Eckerdal, R. McCartney, Kate Sanders, L. Thomas, Carol Zander
{"title":"Students' perceptions of the differences between formal and informal learning","authors":"Jonas Boustedt, Anna Eckerdal, R. McCartney, Kate Sanders, L. Thomas, Carol Zander","doi":"10.1145/2016911.2016926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that most learning in the workplace takes place outside of formal training and, given the swiftly changing nature of the field, computer science graduates more than most workers, need to be able to learn computing topics outside of organized classes. In this paper we discuss students' perceptions of the difference between formal and informal learning of computing topics, based on three datasets: essays collected from a technical writing course at a single university; the results of a brainstorming exercise conducted in the same course; and semi-structured interviews conducted at six institutions in three countries. The students report strengths and weaknesses in informal learning. On the one hand, they are motivated, can choose their level of learning, can be more flexible about how they learn, and often retain the material better. On the other hand, they perceive that they may miss important aspects of a topic, learn in an ad hoc way, and have difficulty assessing their learning.","PeriodicalId":268925,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Research has shown that most learning in the workplace takes place outside of formal training and, given the swiftly changing nature of the field, computer science graduates more than most workers, need to be able to learn computing topics outside of organized classes. In this paper we discuss students' perceptions of the difference between formal and informal learning of computing topics, based on three datasets: essays collected from a technical writing course at a single university; the results of a brainstorming exercise conducted in the same course; and semi-structured interviews conducted at six institutions in three countries. The students report strengths and weaknesses in informal learning. On the one hand, they are motivated, can choose their level of learning, can be more flexible about how they learn, and often retain the material better. On the other hand, they perceive that they may miss important aspects of a topic, learn in an ad hoc way, and have difficulty assessing their learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对正式学习和非正式学习差异的认知
研究表明,工作场所的大多数学习都是在正规培训之外进行的,考虑到该领域迅速变化的性质,计算机科学毕业生比大多数工人更需要能够在有组织的课程之外学习计算机主题。在本文中,我们基于三个数据集讨论了学生对计算机主题的正式和非正式学习之间差异的看法:从一所大学的技术写作课程中收集的论文;在同一课程中进行的头脑风暴练习的结果;以及在三个国家的六个机构进行的半结构化访谈。学生们报告了在非正式学习中的优势和劣势。一方面,他们有动力,可以选择自己的学习水平,可以更灵活地选择学习方式,并且通常能更好地记住材料。另一方面,他们认为他们可能会错过一个主题的重要方面,以一种特殊的方式学习,并且很难评估他们的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CS majors' self-efficacy perceptions in CS1: results in light of social cognitive theory Personifying programming tool feedback improves novice programmers' learning How CS majors select a specialization Building professional identity as computer science teachers: supporting secondary computer science teachers through reflection and community building Predicting at-risk novice Java programmers through the analysis of online protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1