Ancient civilization: Mycenaean evolution and the revolution of Dark Ages

V. Tarasevych
{"title":"Ancient civilization: Mycenaean evolution and the revolution of Dark Ages","authors":"V. Tarasevych","doi":"10.15407/ETET2020.04.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article continues the series of publications devoted to the universum evolution of ancient civilization and its sub-civilizations. The author analyzes the evolution of the Mycenaean civilizational area and the revolutionary changes of the dark ages. It is shown that the Mycenaean civilizational range, like Crete-Cyclades, belongs to the Middle subtype of the Eastern type of social evolution; however, unlike the latter, the coastal and inland continental subareas are quite clearly identified. With the prevalence of their common Middle-East-West (MEW) characteristics, the first component has a comparatively high significance of the Western type, and therefore, the Middle-Western subtype of the Eastern type is inherent in it, while the Middle subtype prevails in the second component, which is typical for the Middle-Middle subtype of the Eastern type of evolution. The Dorian conquests of the Sub-Mycenaean period interrupted the dominance of the Eastern line of social evolution in Ancient Greece. The palace farms were destroyed, and so were the corresponding social forms. The \"Iron Revolution\" of the X-XI centuries catalyzed the processes immanent to the Middle type of social evolution. In the Homeric era, on the one hand, the components of the universal Middle ground “declared their claims to dominance”, in particular, in the form of technological patterns of non-irrigated agriculture, cattle breeding, river and sea fishing, community military democracy, collective-individual community appropriation of indivisible land, basic tools and proto-ins titles. On the other hand, components of a new, special Middle type appear, for example, collective-clan (family) private exo-appropriation of land and tools, and collective-clan (family) personal endo-appropriation of essential human powers and institutions. Unfortunately, the shortage of historical data prevents accurate definition of the evolution subtype of Homer's society.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ETET2020.04.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article continues the series of publications devoted to the universum evolution of ancient civilization and its sub-civilizations. The author analyzes the evolution of the Mycenaean civilizational area and the revolutionary changes of the dark ages. It is shown that the Mycenaean civilizational range, like Crete-Cyclades, belongs to the Middle subtype of the Eastern type of social evolution; however, unlike the latter, the coastal and inland continental subareas are quite clearly identified. With the prevalence of their common Middle-East-West (MEW) characteristics, the first component has a comparatively high significance of the Western type, and therefore, the Middle-Western subtype of the Eastern type is inherent in it, while the Middle subtype prevails in the second component, which is typical for the Middle-Middle subtype of the Eastern type of evolution. The Dorian conquests of the Sub-Mycenaean period interrupted the dominance of the Eastern line of social evolution in Ancient Greece. The palace farms were destroyed, and so were the corresponding social forms. The "Iron Revolution" of the X-XI centuries catalyzed the processes immanent to the Middle type of social evolution. In the Homeric era, on the one hand, the components of the universal Middle ground “declared their claims to dominance”, in particular, in the form of technological patterns of non-irrigated agriculture, cattle breeding, river and sea fishing, community military democracy, collective-individual community appropriation of indivisible land, basic tools and proto-ins titles. On the other hand, components of a new, special Middle type appear, for example, collective-clan (family) private exo-appropriation of land and tools, and collective-clan (family) personal endo-appropriation of essential human powers and institutions. Unfortunately, the shortage of historical data prevents accurate definition of the evolution subtype of Homer's society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古代文明:迈锡尼人的进化和黑暗时代的革命
本文是致力于古代文明及其次文明的宇宙演化的系列出版物的延续。作者分析了迈锡尼文明区的演变和黑暗时代的革命性变化。结果表明,迈锡尼文明范围与克里特-基克拉迪斯一样,属于东方社会进化类型的中间亚型;然而,与后者不同的是,沿海和内陆大陆分区是相当明确的。随着它们共同的中东-西方(Middle- east - west, MEW)特征的普遍存在,第一个分量具有较高的西方型显著性,因此,东方型的中西部亚型是其固有的,而第二个分量以中部亚型为主,这是东方型进化的典型中-中部亚型。亚迈锡尼时期多里安人的征服打断了古希腊社会进化的东方路线的主导地位。宫殿的农场被摧毁了,相应的社会形态也被摧毁了。x - 11世纪的“铁器革命”催化了中间类型社会演变的内在过程。在荷马时代,一方面,普遍中间地带的组成部分“宣布了他们的统治主张”,特别是以非灌溉农业、养牛、河海捕鱼、社区军事民主、集体-个人社区占有不可分割的土地、基本工具和原始所有权的技术模式的形式。另一方面,出现了一种新的、特殊的中间类型的组成部分,例如,集体氏族(家庭)对土地和工具的私人外部占有,以及集体氏族(家庭)对人类基本权力和制度的个人内部占有。不幸的是,历史资料的缺乏阻碍了对荷马社会进化亚型的准确定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic pragmatism: political-economy essence, antipodes and imitation A classical ancient polis: the power-holding group and the features of exchange and appropriation Oligopoly control and unification of quantitative indexes to control different types of monopoly Strategic planning as a way of public administration Value-based work motivation: the East Asian experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1