{"title":"Editorial: Of the Philosophies of Africa – Theory and Practice","authors":"G. Cipriani, Felix O. Olatunji","doi":"10.1163/24683949-12340071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volume 8.1 of Culture and Dialogue is devoted to aspects of African thought and in particular philosophy, whether theoretical or practical. This issue has been generously guest-edited by Felix O. Olatunji, of Ladoke Akintola University of Technology and Osun State University, Nigeria. As reflected in the selection of essays, the overall concern of this issue is not really to question whether there is such a thing as “African philosophy.” Thankfully, for many, the answer to this question is simply provided in the significant and multifarious corpus of texts produced across the continent of Africa and its history. Of course, any question concerning “African philosophy,” i.e. a specifically pan-African discipline with its own methods and forms, is partly different from that of “African thought” in general, for the latter includes not only processes of consciousness that reflect on the natural and human fields, but also practices whose very nature is to create or express specific cultural textures. Indeed, the choice of “African Thought” – rather than “African Philosophy” – in the title of this journal issue is a way of leaving the door open to thought-practices that would be considered as foreign or simply borderline to what is usually considered as philosophy by the Western establishment, that is, by those who have come to believe and persuade the rest of the world that the love of wisdom is the love of logos. For example, how practical, literary, or ethnological can philosophy be before it becomes something else? From this perspective, the question as to what constitutes philosophy “proper” within the context of Africa can understandably be, in itself, dismissed as a mere semantic one. This is not to say that endeavours to characterise, develop and renew a body of philosophical disciplines that is typically of Africa – African philosophy – is meaningless. Philosophy as a thinking-process that develops within specific natural and human environments, or as awakening to modes of being or the emptying nature of things or even to their relational nature, counts as one of the fundamental ingredients that contribute to building a voice for others to listen to, learn from, and in turn be renewed. On this account, what can be more justified and even natural than to seek to think through one’s own languages and customs? Of course, the histories of the countries and various regions and","PeriodicalId":160891,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Dialogue","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24683949-12340071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Volume 8.1 of Culture and Dialogue is devoted to aspects of African thought and in particular philosophy, whether theoretical or practical. This issue has been generously guest-edited by Felix O. Olatunji, of Ladoke Akintola University of Technology and Osun State University, Nigeria. As reflected in the selection of essays, the overall concern of this issue is not really to question whether there is such a thing as “African philosophy.” Thankfully, for many, the answer to this question is simply provided in the significant and multifarious corpus of texts produced across the continent of Africa and its history. Of course, any question concerning “African philosophy,” i.e. a specifically pan-African discipline with its own methods and forms, is partly different from that of “African thought” in general, for the latter includes not only processes of consciousness that reflect on the natural and human fields, but also practices whose very nature is to create or express specific cultural textures. Indeed, the choice of “African Thought” – rather than “African Philosophy” – in the title of this journal issue is a way of leaving the door open to thought-practices that would be considered as foreign or simply borderline to what is usually considered as philosophy by the Western establishment, that is, by those who have come to believe and persuade the rest of the world that the love of wisdom is the love of logos. For example, how practical, literary, or ethnological can philosophy be before it becomes something else? From this perspective, the question as to what constitutes philosophy “proper” within the context of Africa can understandably be, in itself, dismissed as a mere semantic one. This is not to say that endeavours to characterise, develop and renew a body of philosophical disciplines that is typically of Africa – African philosophy – is meaningless. Philosophy as a thinking-process that develops within specific natural and human environments, or as awakening to modes of being or the emptying nature of things or even to their relational nature, counts as one of the fundamental ingredients that contribute to building a voice for others to listen to, learn from, and in turn be renewed. On this account, what can be more justified and even natural than to seek to think through one’s own languages and customs? Of course, the histories of the countries and various regions and
《文化与对话》第8.1卷致力于非洲思想的各个方面,特别是哲学,无论是理论还是实践。本期由尼日利亚拉多克阿金托拉理工大学和奥松州立大学的Felix O. Olatunji慷慨地担任客座编辑。正如文章选集所反映的那样,这个问题的总体关注并不是真的质疑是否存在“非洲哲学”这样的东西。值得庆幸的是,对许多人来说,这个问题的答案简单地提供在整个非洲大陆及其历史上产生的重要和多样的文本语料库中。当然,任何有关“非洲哲学”的问题,即一门具有自己的方法和形式的泛非学科,都部分不同于一般的“非洲思想”,因为后者不仅包括反映自然和人类领域的意识过程,而且还包括其本质是创造或表达特定文化纹理的实践。事实上,在这期杂志的标题中选择“非洲思想”——而不是“非洲哲学”——是一种为思想实践敞开大门的方式,这些思想实践将被认为是外来的,或者仅仅是与西方机构通常认为的哲学相边缘,也就是说,那些已经开始相信并说服世界其他地方的人,对智慧的热爱就是对逻各斯的热爱。例如,哲学在变成别的东西之前,它能有多实用、多文学、多民族学?从这个角度来看,在非洲的背景下,什么构成哲学“适当”的问题本身可以理解为仅仅是一个语义问题。这并不是说,努力描绘、发展和更新一套典型的非洲哲学学科——非洲哲学——是没有意义的。哲学作为一种思维过程,在特定的自然和人类环境中发展,或者作为对存在模式的觉醒,或者对事物的空虚本质,甚至对它们的关系本质的觉醒,被视为有助于建立一个声音,让他人倾听、学习,并反过来得到更新的基本成分之一。在这种情况下,还有什么比通过自己的语言和习俗来思考更合理甚至更自然的呢?当然,还有各国和各地区的历史