The Origins of Oligarchy: the Evolution of Communism and the System of Pressure Groups in the USSR

Jaryna Boreńko
{"title":"The Origins of Oligarchy: the Evolution of Communism and the System of Pressure Groups in the USSR","authors":"Jaryna Boreńko","doi":"10.2478/conc-2014-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon of oligarchy in post-Soviet countries, mainly in Russia and Ukraine, has recently become the label for the functioning of the political system to distinguish the real participants of political processes. They, in fact, due to their un-established legal status replace the formal structures of a state, such as political parties or local authorities, in the process of decision making. The characteristics of the oligarchs` activities, their high position on the lists of the wealthiest people of the world, as well as their participation in opposition (e.g. Gusinski in Russia) or so called „ruling” oligarchs, result in new theories explaining the formation of a new political system and regime. Here we encounter methodological issues concerning the question of how political processes taking place on the territory of the former Soviet Union should be treated. While the institutional and legal analysis implies that the political system of the post-Soviet countries evolves towards democracy, the analysis of behaviour and activities of political subjects assumes that in the reality of so called „institutional democracy” informal governing structures come into existence, whose activities can be described as nothing more than antidemocratic. Such structures, referred to as oligarchies, are not a novelty in the history of the development of group system in Soviet society. They result from the evolution of the communist system, especially specific activities of pressure groups. When we pay more attention to the characteristics of political activity and behaviour, and less to the institutional conditioning of the system, the evolution of the group system in Russian policy perceived as the phenomenon of the influence of informal subjects on decision making, enables the comprehension of the character of the modern day oligarchy. Apart from treating both the social structure and political system in the Soviet Union as the nomenklatura (Woslenskij)1, barrackstyle communism, etacrarian impire (Radajew, Szkaratan)2 or as corporatocracy, which were discussed widely in the 1980s, the term oligarchy appeared in the second half of the 1950s. It was used by Milowan Dilas in his analysis of post-Stalin period of governing „The New Class”. According to Dilas it is the","PeriodicalId":139060,"journal":{"name":"Confrontation and Cooperation: 1000 Years of Polish-German-Russian Relations","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Confrontation and Cooperation: 1000 Years of Polish-German-Russian Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/conc-2014-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenon of oligarchy in post-Soviet countries, mainly in Russia and Ukraine, has recently become the label for the functioning of the political system to distinguish the real participants of political processes. They, in fact, due to their un-established legal status replace the formal structures of a state, such as political parties or local authorities, in the process of decision making. The characteristics of the oligarchs` activities, their high position on the lists of the wealthiest people of the world, as well as their participation in opposition (e.g. Gusinski in Russia) or so called „ruling” oligarchs, result in new theories explaining the formation of a new political system and regime. Here we encounter methodological issues concerning the question of how political processes taking place on the territory of the former Soviet Union should be treated. While the institutional and legal analysis implies that the political system of the post-Soviet countries evolves towards democracy, the analysis of behaviour and activities of political subjects assumes that in the reality of so called „institutional democracy” informal governing structures come into existence, whose activities can be described as nothing more than antidemocratic. Such structures, referred to as oligarchies, are not a novelty in the history of the development of group system in Soviet society. They result from the evolution of the communist system, especially specific activities of pressure groups. When we pay more attention to the characteristics of political activity and behaviour, and less to the institutional conditioning of the system, the evolution of the group system in Russian policy perceived as the phenomenon of the influence of informal subjects on decision making, enables the comprehension of the character of the modern day oligarchy. Apart from treating both the social structure and political system in the Soviet Union as the nomenklatura (Woslenskij)1, barrackstyle communism, etacrarian impire (Radajew, Szkaratan)2 or as corporatocracy, which were discussed widely in the 1980s, the term oligarchy appeared in the second half of the 1950s. It was used by Milowan Dilas in his analysis of post-Stalin period of governing „The New Class”. According to Dilas it is the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寡头政治的起源:苏联共产主义的演变和压力集团制度
后苏联国家,主要是俄罗斯和乌克兰的寡头政治现象,最近已成为区分政治进程真正参与者的政治制度运作的标签。事实上,由于其未确立的法律地位,它们在决策过程中取代了一个国家的正式结构,如政党或地方当局。寡头们活动的特点,他们在世界上最富有的人名单上的高地位,以及他们参与反对派(如俄罗斯的Gusinski)或所谓的“统治”寡头,导致了解释新政治制度和政权形成的新理论。在这里,我们遇到了关于如何对待在前苏联领土上发生的政治进程问题的方法论问题。虽然制度和法律分析意味着后苏联国家的政治制度向民主发展,但对政治主体行为和活动的分析假设,在所谓的“制度民主”现实中存在非正式的治理结构,其活动可以被描述为无非是反民主。这种结构被称为寡头政治,在苏联社会集团制度的发展史上并不是一个新鲜事物。它们是共产主义制度演变的结果,特别是压力集团的具体活动。当我们更多地关注政治活动和行为的特征,而不是系统的制度条件时,俄罗斯政策中群体系统的演变被视为非正式主体对决策的影响现象,使我们能够理解现代寡头政治的特征。除了将苏联的社会结构和政治制度视为名门阶级(沃斯连斯基)1、营房式共产主义(兵营式共产主义)、独裁帝国(拉达jew, Szkaratan)2或公司政治(在20世纪80年代被广泛讨论过)之外,寡头政治(oligarchy)一词出现在20世纪50年代后半期。Milowan Dilas在分析斯大林后统治时期的“新阶级”时使用了这个词。根据Dilas的说法,它是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Tourism Cooperation Based on “the Belt and Road”: Strategy and Path The Fight for Free Navigation. Construction of the Channel by the Vistula Spit as Part of the Political Struggle with the Russian Federation Security Issues in the Integrated Management Perspective Update of Internal Political Threats to the National Security of Ukraine at the Local Level in the Process of Administrative and Territorial Reform The Threat to the Life of the Nation as an Introductory Premise of the Derogation of Obligations in the Domain of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1