Is there a link between psychopathy and self-harm? A review of the literature

L. Campbell, A. Beech
{"title":"Is there a link between psychopathy and self-harm? A review of the literature","authors":"L. Campbell, A. Beech","doi":"10.15173/IJRR.V1I2.3475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this review was to examine whether there is a link between psychopathy and self-harm.  A systematic search identified 14 papers which examine this link. A quality appraisal checklist was used to evaluate the quality of each study. The application of the quality appraisal checklist showed that the majority of the studies had good internal validity; however, there were some biases that affected the external validity of some studies. The results indicated that there may be a positive association between total psychopathy score and self-harm; however some studies with smaller sample sizes and low rates of self-harm failed to show this association. The results of most of the studies showed a positive association between Factor 2 of the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) and self-harm. No link was found between Factor 1 and self-harm. The results did not show consistent evidence for a link between any of the four facets and self-harm. Although this review indicates a link between Factor 2 and self-harm, and a possible link between total psychopathy score and self-harm, the small number of studies in this area means that the research is not robust enough to provide strong evidence for these associations.","PeriodicalId":181328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/IJRR.V1I2.3475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this review was to examine whether there is a link between psychopathy and self-harm.  A systematic search identified 14 papers which examine this link. A quality appraisal checklist was used to evaluate the quality of each study. The application of the quality appraisal checklist showed that the majority of the studies had good internal validity; however, there were some biases that affected the external validity of some studies. The results indicated that there may be a positive association between total psychopathy score and self-harm; however some studies with smaller sample sizes and low rates of self-harm failed to show this association. The results of most of the studies showed a positive association between Factor 2 of the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) and self-harm. No link was found between Factor 1 and self-harm. The results did not show consistent evidence for a link between any of the four facets and self-harm. Although this review indicates a link between Factor 2 and self-harm, and a possible link between total psychopathy score and self-harm, the small number of studies in this area means that the research is not robust enough to provide strong evidence for these associations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神变态和自残之间有联系吗?文献综述
这篇综述的目的是研究精神变态和自残之间是否存在联系。一项系统的搜索发现了14篇研究这种联系的论文。质量评估检查表用于评估每项研究的质量。质量评价表的应用表明,大多数研究具有良好的内部效度;然而,存在一些偏差,影响了一些研究的外部效度。结果表明:心理变态总分与自我伤害存在正相关;然而,一些样本量较小、自残率较低的研究未能显示出这种联系。大多数研究结果显示,心理变态检查表(PCL-R)因子2;Hare, 2003)和自残。没有发现因子1和自残之间的联系。结果并没有一致的证据表明这四个方面中的任何一个与自残之间存在联系。尽管这篇综述表明了因子2和自残之间的联系,以及总精神病得分和自残之间的可能联系,但这一领域的少量研究意味着该研究不够有力,无法为这些联系提供强有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Violence risk assessment of older adults. The psychiatric aspects of terrorism: Prevention and rehabilitation. Impacts of implementing a forensic treatment mall: A program evaluation A conceptual framework for the management of a COVID-19 outbreak on a secure forensic Inpatient unit. Convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of two instruments to assess recidivism risk among released individuals who have sexually offended: The SORAG and the VRAG-R.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1