Forging a Precedent: the Purpose and Legacy of The “Laws of Edward and Guthrum”

Ioan-Andrei Crișan
{"title":"Forging a Precedent: the Purpose and Legacy of The “Laws of Edward and Guthrum”","authors":"Ioan-Andrei Crișan","doi":"10.33993/eb.2021.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To properly understand the intricate workings of Wulfstan’s intimidating legislative corpus, one should look more keenly into its genesis. The law code titled “The Laws of Edward and Guthrum” has largely been ignored and our understanding of the archbishop’s purpose and methodology is perhaps the poorer for it: in its current form, the code represents Wulfstan’s earliest attempt at legislation. It survives in two manuscripts: Cambridge Corpus Christi College 383 (B) and Strood, Medway Archive and Local Studies Centre, MS DRc/R1 (H), also known as Textus Roffensis. The present paper aims at elucidating how the provisions first mentioned here helped shape many of Wulfstan’s later laws, and that the text itself should not be interpreted as merely one’s first attempt at legislation. Quite the opposite, “The Laws of Edward and Guthrum” should be perceived as an invaluable key through which much of the later Anglo-Saxon legislation can be understood.","PeriodicalId":380509,"journal":{"name":"Études bibliologiques/Library Research Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Études bibliologiques/Library Research Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/eb.2021.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To properly understand the intricate workings of Wulfstan’s intimidating legislative corpus, one should look more keenly into its genesis. The law code titled “The Laws of Edward and Guthrum” has largely been ignored and our understanding of the archbishop’s purpose and methodology is perhaps the poorer for it: in its current form, the code represents Wulfstan’s earliest attempt at legislation. It survives in two manuscripts: Cambridge Corpus Christi College 383 (B) and Strood, Medway Archive and Local Studies Centre, MS DRc/R1 (H), also known as Textus Roffensis. The present paper aims at elucidating how the provisions first mentioned here helped shape many of Wulfstan’s later laws, and that the text itself should not be interpreted as merely one’s first attempt at legislation. Quite the opposite, “The Laws of Edward and Guthrum” should be perceived as an invaluable key through which much of the later Anglo-Saxon legislation can be understood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开创先例:“爱德华与古瑟伦法”的目的与遗产
要想正确理解沃尔夫斯坦令人生畏的立法主体的复杂运作,人们应该更敏锐地审视其起源。这部名为《爱德华和古瑟伦法》的法典在很大程度上被忽视了,我们对大主教的目的和方法的理解可能因此而更贫乏:以目前的形式来看,法典代表了沃尔夫斯坦最早的立法尝试。它保存在两份手稿中:剑桥科珀斯克里斯蒂学院383 (B)和斯特鲁德,梅德韦档案和地方研究中心,MS DRc/R1 (H),也被称为Textus Roffensis。本文旨在阐明这里首先提到的条款如何帮助形成了许多伍尔夫斯坦后来的法律,并且案文本身不应被解释为仅仅是立法的第一次尝试。恰恰相反,《爱德华和古瑟伦法》应该被视为一把无价的钥匙,通过它可以理解后来的盎格鲁-撒克逊立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Boethius, ‟De Consolatione Philosophiae”, Nürnberg, 1473 – an Incunabulum from The Brukenthal National Museum Library, Sibiu The Restoration of a Hunedoara Noble Family’s Library: the Kenderesi from Sălaşu de Sus A new Fragment of the Antiphonale Varadiense at the Romanian Academy Library in Cluj/Un nouveau fragment de L’Antiphonale Varadiense a la Bibliotheque de L’Academie Roumaine, Cluj The Library of Mavrocordatos Family Les illustrations de Mihail Strilbițchi du Ceaslov de Dubăsari de 1794
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1